Pharmerit International, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA.
J Med Econ. 2013 Aug;16(8):1061-70. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2013.811078. Epub 2013 Jun 17.
To conduct a retrospective analysis of the association between drug tolerability and potential economic impact measured by medical resource utilization (MRU) for prophylaxis of invasive antifungal infections (IFI) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHCT).
An open-label, multi-center study (IMPROVIT) included patients (≥12-years old) who were randomized to receive oral voriconazole (VOR) or oral itraconazole (ITR) from the alloHCT day for at least 100 days and up to 180 days. Trial data on discontinuation and MRU for the first 100 days were analyzed.
Two hundred and twenty-four patients were in VOR and 241 in ITR, with similar demographic distributions (average age of 43 years, 58% male, 92% Caucasian). All-cause and study drug intolerance discontinuations were less frequent with VOR than ITR (50% vs 63%, p = 0.0137; 7% vs 22%, p < 0.0001). VOR patients had longer study drug exposure (median = 96 vs 68 days, p < 0.0001; mean = 68 vs 60 days, p = 0.0044). ITR patients were 2-times more likely (p = 0.0110) to use other antifungals vs VOR patients. Controlling for treatment and key baseline variables, longer IFI prophylaxis was associated with fewer hospital days (p < 0.0001) and less other antifungal use (p < 0.0001). Patients who discontinued prophylaxis during the first 100 days incurred 10 more hospital days (p < 0.0001) and 17 more other antifungal days (p < 0.0001) compared to their counterparts. Eight more prophylaxis days were associated with ∼1 less hospital day and 3.6 less other antifungal days (p < 0.0001). Key limitation: MRU data collection was limited to the first 100 days post-transplant, which may not fully capture the real-world utilization and outcomes.
Patients' ability to tolerate and continue their antifungal prophylaxis after alloHCT is associated with less use of MRU such as other antifungals and hospital days. In the current resource-constrained healthcare environment, it is important to consider the potential economic impact of the tolerability of antifungal prophylaxis.
对异基因造血干细胞移植(alloHCT)后侵袭性真菌感染(IFI)预防的药物耐受性与医疗资源利用(MRU)潜在经济影响之间的相关性进行回顾性分析。
一项开放性、多中心研究(IMPROVIT)纳入了≥12 岁的患者,他们被随机分配接受口服伏立康唑(VOR)或口服伊曲康唑(ITR),从 alloHCT 日开始至少 100 天,最长 180 天。分析了前 100 天停药和 MRU 的试验数据。
224 例患者接受 VOR,241 例患者接受 ITR,两组患者的人口统计学分布相似(平均年龄为 43 岁,58%为男性,92%为白种人)。与 ITR 相比,VOR 导致的全因和研究药物不耐受停药较少(50% vs 63%,p=0.0137;7% vs 22%,p<0.0001)。VOR 患者的研究药物暴露时间更长(中位数=96 天 vs 68 天,p<0.0001;均值=68 天 vs 60 天,p=0.0044)。与 VOR 患者相比,ITR 患者使用其他抗真菌药物的可能性增加了两倍(p=0.0110)。在控制治疗和关键基线变量后,更长的 IFI 预防与更少的住院天数(p<0.0001)和更少的其他抗真菌药物使用(p<0.0001)相关。在前 100 天内停止预防治疗的患者,住院天数增加 10 天(p<0.0001),其他抗真菌药物使用天数增加 17 天(p<0.0001)。与他们的对照组相比,每增加 8 天的预防治疗天数,住院天数减少 1 天,其他抗真菌药物使用天数减少 3.6 天(p<0.0001)。
alloHCT 后患者能够耐受和继续其抗真菌预防治疗与其他抗真菌药物和住院天数等 MRU 的使用减少相关。在当前资源有限的医疗环境下,考虑抗真菌预防治疗的耐受性对潜在经济影响很重要。