Hansson L, Dahlöf B, Gudbrandsson T, Hellsing T, Kullman S, Kuylenstierna J, Leppert J, Möller B, Skogström K, Svensson A
Department of Medicine, Ostra Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden.
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1988 Jul;12(1):94-101. doi: 10.1097/00005344-198807000-00013.
In a double-blind randomized study, hydralazine (n = 59) or the new dihydropyridine calcium antagonist felodipine (n = 61) was added to previous treatment with beta-adrenoceptor blocking agents in a group of 120 patients with essential hypertension. Active treatment with either hydralazine or felodipine was given for 8 weeks after a 4-week placebo run-in period, at the end of which all patients had supine diastolic blood pressures greater than 95 mm Hg. Assessment of the results according to the intention to treat principle showed that felodipine was significantly more effective than hydralazine at the doses employed, reducing systolic blood pressure 10-19 mm Hg more than hydralazine and reducing diastolic blood pressure 5-11 mm Hg more than hydralazine (95% confidence intervals). The number of patients complaining of side effects, the number of complaints, and the number of patients that had to be withdrawn from treatment were numerically higher during treatment with hydralazine than with felodipine, but these differences were not statistically significant. Against this background it is concluded that felodipine is superior to hydralazine when added to an antihypertensive regimen consisting of beta-adrenoceptor blocking agents.
在一项双盲随机研究中,将肼屈嗪(n = 59)或新型二氢吡啶类钙拮抗剂非洛地平(n = 61)添加到120例原发性高血压患者先前使用的β-肾上腺素能受体阻滞剂治疗中。在为期4周的安慰剂导入期后,使用肼屈嗪或非洛地平进行积极治疗8周,在此期末所有患者的仰卧位舒张压均高于95 mmHg。根据意向性治疗原则对结果进行评估显示,在所使用的剂量下,非洛地平比肼屈嗪显著更有效,收缩压降低幅度比肼屈嗪多10 - 19 mmHg,舒张压降低幅度比肼屈嗪多5 - 11 mmHg(95%置信区间)。在使用肼屈嗪治疗期间,抱怨副作用的患者数量、抱怨次数以及必须退出治疗的患者数量在数值上高于使用非洛地平治疗时,但这些差异无统计学意义。在此背景下得出结论,当添加到由β-肾上腺素能受体阻滞剂组成的抗高血压方案中时,非洛地平优于肼屈嗪。