Center for Conservation Biology, Department of Biological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305-5020, USA.
Department of Zoology, Miami University, Oxford, OH, 45056, USA.
Oecologia. 2002 Sep;133(1):78-89. doi: 10.1007/s00442-002-1003-8. Epub 2014 Mar 4.
We used nested subsets analysis to examine distribution patterns of birds and butterflies in the same set of 83 locations in canyons of three mountain ranges in the Great Basin of western North America. We tested whether the same environmental variables influenced nestedness among taxonomic groups and among mountain ranges within taxonomic groups. We also examined whether nestedness of birds and butterflies appeared to be sensitive to human use of riparian areas in the ecoregion. Site area and topography did not appear to differ in their influence on nestedness of birds. By contrast, area and topography differed in how strongly they affected nestedness of butterflies, but their respective influence varied among mountain ranges. Riparian dependence had little discernible effect on nested distribution patterns of either taxonomic group. Because processes influencing distribution patterns can differ among taxonomic groups, and the relative importance of those processes may vary spatially even within a taxonomic group, we urge restraint in using birds and butterflies as surrogates of other taxa for conservation planning.
我们使用嵌套子集分析来研究在北美洲西部大盆地三个山脉峡谷的 83 个相同地点中鸟类和蝴蝶的分布模式。我们检验了相同的环境变量是否影响分类群之间以及分类群内山脉之间的嵌套性。我们还检查了鸟类和蝴蝶的嵌套性是否对生态区河岸地区的人类使用敏感。地点面积和地形似乎对鸟类嵌套性的影响没有差异。相比之下,面积和地形对蝴蝶嵌套性的影响程度不同,但它们各自的影响在山脉之间有所不同。河岸依赖对两个分类群的嵌套分布模式都没有明显的影响。由于影响分布模式的过程可能在分类群之间有所不同,并且即使在分类群内,这些过程的相对重要性也可能在空间上有所不同,因此我们敦促在进行保护规划时,谨慎使用鸟类和蝴蝶作为其他类群的替代品。