Suppr超能文献

评估血清CA-125、CA15-3、CA-19-9、癌胚抗原和甲胎蛋白水平对于鉴别附件肿块良恶性的重要性以及不同检测组合对诊断准确性的贡献。

Evaluation of the importance of the serum levels of CA-125, CA15-3, CA-19-9, carcinoembryonic antigen and alpha fetoprotein for distinguishing benign and malignant adnexal masses and contribution of different test combinations to diagnostic accuracy.

作者信息

Bozkurt M, Yumru A E, Aral I

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Taksim Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Afyon Kocatepe University, Afyon, Turkey.

出版信息

Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2013;34(6):540-4.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to investigate the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPPV) of the serum levels of CA-125, CA15-3, CA19-9, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) in the differentiation of benign and malignant ovarian tumors histopathologically diagnosed in patients and to determine the effects of the different test combinations on diagnostic accuracy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

One-hundred sixty-eight patients that had their preoperative CA-125, CA15-3, CA19-9, CEA, AFP levels assessed and that were subsequently surgically treated for adnexal masses, were included in the study. For each tumor markers in these patients with histopathologically-confirmed diagnosis, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV, and diagnostic accuracy, and odds ratio were calculated.

RESULTS

The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV of CA125 with cut-off 35 U/ml, were found to be 78.9%, 86.9%, 63.8%, and 93.3%, respectively. The diagnostic odds ratio of CA-125 with cut-off of 35 U/ml, was found to be 25. With cut-off65 U/ml, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV values were 65.7%, 95.3%, 80.6%, and 90.5%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of CEA were 16%, 93%, 37%, and 83%, respectively. For AFP, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV were to be 2.6%, 98%, 33.3%, and 77.5%, respectively. For CA 15-3, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV were found to be 26.3% 96.1%, 66.6%, and 81.6%, respectively. Likelihood ratio tests: positive (LR+) = 6.83 and negative (LR-) = 0.76, with an odds ratio: 8.9. The risk of malignancy for adnexal masses with higher CA15-3 increased by approximately nine times. For CA19-9, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV value were found to be 18.4%, 93%, 43.7%, and 79.6%, respectively. CA19-9 was not statistically significant in the differentiation of benign and malignant of adnexal masses. Even the combinations of CA125 + CEA + CA19-9 and CA125 + CEA + CA19-9 +AFP and CA125 + CA15-3 made a small contribution (one, two, and four cases, respectively), but was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

The levels of CA-125 and CA15-3 were found to be significant in order to distinguish benign and malign; CA 19-9, CEA, and AFP were not found to be significant. The different test combinations did not have contribution for diagnostic accuracy.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨血清CA - 125、CA15 - 3、CA19 - 9、癌胚抗原(CEA)和甲胎蛋白(AFP)水平在经组织病理学诊断的患者良性和恶性卵巢肿瘤鉴别中的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV),并确定不同检测组合对诊断准确性的影响。

材料与方法

168例患者术前进行了CA - 125、CA15 - 3、CA19 - 9、CEA、AFP水平评估,随后因附件肿块接受手术治疗,纳入本研究。对于这些经组织病理学确诊的患者的每种肿瘤标志物,计算其敏感性、特异性、PPV、NPV、诊断准确性和比值比。

结果

CA125临界值为35 U/ml时,敏感性、特异性、PPV和NPV分别为78.9%、86.9%、63.8%和93.3%。CA - 125临界值为35 U/ml时的诊断比值比为25。临界值为65 U/ml时,敏感性、特异性、PPV、NPV值分别为65.7%、95.3%、80.6%和90.5%。CEA的敏感性、特异性、PPV和NPV分别为16%、93%、37%和83%。AFP的敏感性、特异性、PPV和NPV分别为2.6%、98%、33.3%和77.5%。CA 15 - 3的敏感性、特异性、PPV和NPV分别为26.3%、96.1%、66.6%和81.6%。似然比检验:阳性(LR +)= 6.83,阴性(LR -)= 0.76,比值比:8.9。CA15 - 3水平较高的附件肿块的恶性风险增加约9倍。CA19 - 9的敏感性、特异性、PPV和NPV值分别为18.4%、93%、43.7%和79.6%。CA19 - 在附件肿块的良恶性鉴别中无统计学意义。即使是CA125 + CEA + CA19 - 9、CA125 + CEA + CA19 - 9 + AFP和CA125 + CA15 - 3的组合贡献也很小(分别为1例、2例和4例),但无统计学意义。

结论

发现CA - 125和CA15 - 3水平在区分良恶性方面具有重要意义;未发现CA 19 - 9、CEA和AFP具有重要意义。不同的检测组合对诊断准确性无贡献。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验