Suppr超能文献

链激酶与阿替普酶:超声心动图参数及冠状动脉造影术后治疗的比较——我们的经验

Streptokinase versus alteplase: comparison of echocardiographic parameters and post-coronarography treatment--our experience.

作者信息

Resic Nerma, Durak-Nalbantic Azra, Dzubur Alen, Hodzic Enisa, Kulic Mehmed, Sabanovic-Bajramovic Nirvana, Jahic Elmedina

机构信息

Clinic for Heart disease and rheumatism, Clinical Center University of Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Center for the Heart, Clinical Center University of Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina.

出版信息

Med Arch. 2013;67(5):322-5. doi: 10.5455/medarh.2013.67.322-325.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Usage of fibrinolytic therapy leads to reperfusion of the occluded coronary arteries, rescue of ventricle myocardium and successful recovery of patient.

GOAL

The objective of this study was to compare the reperfusion effect of streptokinase and alteplase in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) by analyzing echocardiographic parameters and post-coronarography treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We observed 53 patients in AMI and divided them depending on applied therapy in streptokinase and alteplase group. Both groups were further divided into three subgroups depending on the time passed from chest pain occurrence to admission at Clinic. Observed echocardiographic parameters were: mitral regurgitation, left ventricular systolic and diastolic function and signs of ischemic cardiomyopathy. On coronary angiogram we analyzed severity of coronary artery disease as well as recommended treatment thereafter.

RESULTS

There were no significant difference in post-coronarography treatment, incidence and severity of mitral regurgitation and ischemic cardiomyopathy in alteplase vs streptokinase group- only significantly less diastolic dysfunction was noted in alteplase group (p=0.037). We noticed only significant difference when we took into consideration time from chest pain to admission at clinic. In alteplase first subgroup were more patients treated only with medications (without need for revascularization) vs streptokinase first subgroup (62,5% vs 28.6%, p=0.047). In alteplase first subgroup was lower incidence of mitral regurgitation (p =0.045), developed cardiomyopathy (p =0.009) and more preserved left ventricular diastolic function (p =0.008) compared to first streptokinase subgroup.

CONCLUSION

In our study we have found a significant difference between streptokinase and alteplase in echocardiographic parameters and post-coronarography treatment when we took into consideration time from occurrence of chest pain to admission at Clinic. The best outcomes had patients who were treated with alteplase within 1.5 hour from occurrence of chest pain.

摘要

引言

使用纤溶疗法可使闭塞的冠状动脉再灌注,挽救心室心肌并使患者成功康复。

目的

本研究的目的是通过分析超声心动图参数和冠状动脉造影术后治疗情况,比较链激酶和阿替普酶在急性心肌梗死(AMI)中的再灌注效果。

患者与方法

我们观察了53例AMI患者,并根据所应用的治疗方法将他们分为链激酶组和阿替普酶组。两组又根据从胸痛发作到在诊所入院所经过的时间进一步分为三个亚组。观察的超声心动图参数包括:二尖瓣反流、左心室收缩和舒张功能以及缺血性心肌病的体征。在冠状动脉造影上,我们分析了冠状动脉疾病的严重程度以及此后推荐的治疗方法。

结果

在阿替普酶组和链激酶组之间,冠状动脉造影术后治疗、二尖瓣反流的发生率和严重程度以及缺血性心肌病方面无显著差异,仅阿替普酶组的舒张功能障碍明显较少(p = 0.037)。当我们考虑从胸痛到在诊所入院的时间时,才注意到显著差异。与链激酶第一亚组相比,阿替普酶第一亚组中仅接受药物治疗(无需血运重建)的患者更多(62.5%对28.6%,p = 0.047)。与链激酶第一亚组相比,阿替普酶第一亚组的二尖瓣反流发生率较低(p = 0.045),发生心肌病的情况较少(p = 0.009),左心室舒张功能保留得更好(p = 0.008)。

结论

在我们的研究中,当考虑从胸痛发作到在诊所入院的时间时,发现链激酶和阿替普酶在超声心动图参数和冠状动脉造影术后治疗方面存在显著差异。胸痛发作后1.5小时内接受阿替普酶治疗的患者预后最佳。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验