Divisions of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Ave, N,, Seattle, WA 98109, USA.
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2014 Mar 6;14:15. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-14-15.
With the rapid development of "-omic" technologies, an increasing number of purported biomarkers have been identified for cancer and other diseases. The process of identifying those that are most promising and validating them for use at the population level for prevention and early detection is a critical next step in achieving significant health benefits.
In this paper, we propose that in order to effectively translate biomarkers for practical clinical use, it is important to distinguish and quantify the differences between the use of biomarkers and other risk factors to identify preventive interventions versus their use in disease risk prediction and early detection. We developed mathematical models for quantitatively evaluating risk and benefit in use of biomarkers for disease prevention or early detection. Simple numerical examples were used to demonstrate the potential applications of the models for various types of data.
We propose an index which takes into account potential adverse consequences of biomarker-driven interventions - the 'naïve' ratio of population benefit (RPB) - to facilitate evaluating the potential impact of biomarkers on cancer prevention and personalized medicine. The index RPB is developed for both binary and continuous biomarkers/risk factors. Examples with computational analyses are presented in the paper to contrast the differences in using biomarkers/risk factors for prevention and early detection.
Integrating epidemiologic knowledge into clinical decision making is a key step to translate new biomarkers/risk factors into practical use to achieve health benefits. The RPB proposed in this paper considers the absolute risk of a disease in intervention, and takes into account the risk-benefit effects simultaneously for a marker/exposure at the population level. The RPB illustrates a unique approach to quantitatively assess the risk and potential benefits of using a biomarker/risk factor for intervention in both early detection and prevention.
随着“组学”技术的快速发展,已经发现越来越多用于癌症和其他疾病的所谓生物标志物。在实现重大健康效益的下一步中,确定最有前途和最有效的生物标志物并对其进行验证,以用于人群的预防和早期检测,是一个关键步骤。
在本文中,我们提出为了有效地将生物标志物转化为实际的临床应用,区分和量化生物标志物与其他风险因素的使用之间的差异以确定预防性干预措施与它们在疾病风险预测和早期检测中的使用之间的差异非常重要。我们开发了用于定量评估生物标志物用于疾病预防或早期检测的风险和益处的数学模型。使用简单的数值示例说明了模型在各种类型数据中的潜在应用。
我们提出了一个指数,该指数考虑了生物标志物驱动的干预措施的潜在不良后果 - “天真”的人群获益比(RPB),以促进评估生物标志物对癌症预防和个性化医学的潜在影响。该指数 RPB 既适用于二进制生物标志物/风险因素,也适用于连续生物标志物/风险因素。本文提出了计算分析的示例,以对比使用生物标志物/风险因素进行预防和早期检测的差异。
将流行病学知识纳入临床决策是将新的生物标志物/风险因素转化为实际应用以实现健康效益的关键步骤。本文提出的 RPB 考虑了干预中疾病的绝对风险,并同时考虑了标记物/暴露在人群水平上的风险-效益效应。RPB 说明了一种独特的方法,可用于定量评估在早期检测和预防中使用生物标志物/风险因素进行干预的风险和潜在益处。