Ogreid P, Kloster S E, Guleng R, Skjeggestad O, Mestad O
Department of Surgery, Central Hospital of Rogaland, Stavanger.
Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl. 1988;110:319-28.
The choice between a conventional endoscopic examination of the prostate and a noninvasive technique with ultrasound raises a basic question: Which method is most reliable and informative yet has an acceptable costbenefit ratio? One hundred patients selected on the basis of fixed criteria were examined by ultrasonography and so far 50 have been operated on. Pathologic conditions were observed in the upper urinary tract at ultrasonography in 18% of the cases. The method was found reliable as a basis for the choice between open prostatectomy and transurethral resection. Noninvasive examination of patients with an enlarged prostate is a reliable method in the preoperative evaluation. The method is convenient to the patient and no more time-consuming than cystoscopy. The capital investment in ultrasound is high, but the cost per examination low.
哪种方法最可靠、信息最丰富且成本效益比可接受?根据固定标准选取的100例患者接受了超声检查,到目前为止,已有50例接受了手术。超声检查发现18%的病例上尿路存在病理状况。该方法被认为是在开放性前列腺切除术和经尿道切除术之间做出选择的可靠依据。对前列腺肿大患者进行非侵入性检查是术前评估的可靠方法。该方法对患者方便,且不比膀胱镜检查耗时更多。超声的资本投资高,但每次检查的成本低。