Jones Daniel J, Bunn Frances, Bell-Syer Sophie V
Department of Health Sciences, University of York, Seebohm Rowntree Building, York, UK, YO10 5DD.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Mar 9(3):CD005360. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005360.pub4.
Surgery has been used as part of breast cancer treatment for centuries; however any surgical procedure has the potential risk of infection. Infection rates for surgical treatment of breast cancer are documented at between 3% and 15%, higher than average for a clean surgical procedure. Pre- and perioperative antibiotics have been found to be useful in lowering infection rates in other surgical groups, yet there is no consensus on the use of prophylactic antibiotics for breast cancer surgery.
To determine the effects of prophylactic (pre- or perioperative) antibiotics on the incidence of surgical site infection (SSI) after breast cancer surgery.
For this third update we searched the Cochrane Wounds Group Specialised Register (5 December 2013); the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library); the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE) (The Cochrane Library); Ovid MEDLINE; Ovid MEDLINE (In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations); Ovid EMBASE; and EBSCO CINAHL. We applied no language or date restrictions.
Randomised controlled trials of pre- and perioperative antibiotics for patients undergoing surgery for breast cancer were included. Primary outcomes were rates of surgical site infection (SSI) and adverse reactions.
Two review authors independently examined the title and abstracts of all studies identified by the search strategy, then assessed study quality and extracted data from those that met the inclusion criteria.
A total of eleven studies (2867 participants) were included in the review. Ten studies evaluated preoperative antibiotic compared with no antibiotic or placebo. One study evaluated perioperative antibiotic compared with no antibiotic. Pooling of the results demonstrated that prophylactic antibiotics administered preoperatively significantly reduce the incidence of SSI for patients undergoing breast cancer surgery without reconstruction (pooled risk ratio (RR) 0.67, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.53 to 0.85). Analysis of the single study comparing perioperative antibiotic with no antibiotic found no statistically significant effect of antibiotics on the incidence of SSI (RR 0.11, 95% CI 0.01 to 1.95). No studies presented separate data for patients who underwent reconstructive surgery at the time of removal of the breast tumour.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic antibiotics administered preoperatively reduce the risk of SSI in patients undergoing surgery for breast cancer. Further studies involving patients undergoing immediate breast reconstruction are needed as studies have identified this group as being at higher risk of infection than those who do not undergo immediate breast reconstruction.
几个世纪以来,手术一直是乳腺癌治疗的一部分;然而,任何外科手术都有感染的潜在风险。乳腺癌手术治疗的感染率记录在3%至15%之间,高于清洁外科手术的平均感染率。已发现术前和围手术期使用抗生素有助于降低其他外科手术组的感染率,但对于乳腺癌手术预防性使用抗生素尚无共识。
确定预防性(术前或围手术期)抗生素对乳腺癌手术后手术部位感染(SSI)发生率的影响。
在本次第三次更新中,我们检索了Cochrane伤口小组专业注册库(2013年12月5日);Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)(Cochrane图书馆);疗效评价文摘数据库(DARE)(Cochrane图书馆);Ovid MEDLINE;Ovid MEDLINE(在研及其他未索引引文);Ovid EMBASE;以及EBSCO CINAHL。我们未设语言或日期限制。
纳入了关于乳腺癌手术患者术前和围手术期使用抗生素的随机对照试验。主要结局是手术部位感染(SSI)率和不良反应。
两位综述作者独立审查了检索策略确定的所有研究的标题和摘要,然后评估研究质量并从符合纳入标准的研究中提取数据。
本综述共纳入11项研究(2867名参与者)。10项研究评估了术前使用抗生素与不使用抗生素或安慰剂的比较。1项研究评估了围手术期使用抗生素与不使用抗生素的比较。结果汇总表明,术前给予预防性抗生素可显著降低未进行重建的乳腺癌手术患者的SSI发生率(合并风险比(RR)0.67,95%置信区间(CI)0.53至0.85)。对比较围手术期使用抗生素与不使用抗生素的单项研究分析发现,抗生素对SSI发生率无统计学显著影响(RR 0.11,95%CI 0.01至1.95)。没有研究提供乳腺癌肿瘤切除时进行重建手术患者的单独数据。
术前给予预防性抗生素可降低乳腺癌手术患者的SSI风险。由于研究已确定立即进行乳房重建的患者比未进行立即乳房重建的患者感染风险更高,因此需要对这组患者进行进一步研究。