Diagnostic Cardiovascular Imaging Section, Department of Radiological Sciences at the University of California Los Angeles, Peter V. Ueberroth Building, Suite 3371, 10945 LeConte Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Diagnostic Cardiovascular Imaging Section, Department of Radiological Sciences at the University of California Los Angeles, Peter V. Ueberroth Building, Suite 3371, 10945 LeConte Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Clin Radiol. 2014 Jun;69(6):574-80. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2014.01.002. Epub 2014 Mar 6.
To assess the value of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the preoperative evaluation of congenital heart disease patients about to undergo redo sternotomy.
Forty-three patients (26 male, 17 female, median age 65 months) underwent contrast-enhanced CT and 24 patients (16 male, eight female, median age 89 months) underwent MRI prior to redo sternotomy for congenital heart disease. The informed consent requirement was waived by the institutional review board for this Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) compliant study. A standardized CT protocol utilizing a 64 section multidetector machine and an unenhanced and contrast-enhanced MRI multisequence protocol was used. Images were qualitatively graded and retrosternal distances were measured as part of a risk assessment score.
There were no statistically significant differences between the observers' grades regarding most retrosternal structures at both CT and MRI, separately (p > 0.05); furthermore, both readers found CT to be superior to MRI in qualitative grading except one reader's grades for shunts/conduits (p = 0.107). κ-values were good to excellent (κ ≥ 0.61) for most structures in qualitative grading of cases and risk assessment scores. There were no significant differences between grades of important structures using the same technique based on Friedman's test (p > 0.05). Analysis showed no difference between risk scores given to CT and MRI patients (p > 0.05).
The present findings demonstrate the value of imaging to evaluate retrosternal anatomy. CT could be more valuable than MRI and could play a pivotal role in the surgical planning of CHD patients prior to redo operations.
评估计算机断层扫描(CT)和磁共振成像(MRI)在拟行再次胸骨切开术的先天性心脏病患者术前评估中的价值。
43 名患者(男 26 例,女 17 例,中位年龄 65 个月)在再次胸骨切开术前接受了增强 CT 检查,24 名患者(男 16 例,女 8 例,中位年龄 89 个月)接受了 MRI 检查。该研究符合健康保险流通与责任法案(HIPAA)的规定,机构审查委员会豁免了知情同意要求。使用 64 层多排螺旋 CT 机和非增强及增强 MRI 多序列协议进行标准化 CT 检查方案。对图像进行定性分级,并测量胸骨后距离,作为风险评估评分的一部分。
在 CT 和 MRI 检查中,观察者对大多数胸骨后结构的分级之间没有统计学差异(p>0.05);此外,两位读者均发现 CT 在定性分级方面优于 MRI,除一位读者对分流/导管的分级(p=0.107)。在病例的定性分级和风险评估评分中,大多数结构的κ 值为良好至优秀(κ≥0.61)。基于 Friedman 检验,同一技术评估重要结构的分级之间没有显著差异(p>0.05)。分析显示,CT 和 MRI 患者的风险评分没有差异(p>0.05)。
本研究结果表明,影像学在评估胸骨后解剖结构方面具有重要价值。CT 可能比 MRI 更有价值,并在先天性心脏病患者再次手术前的手术计划中发挥关键作用。