Santo Vincent J, Dargon Phong, Azarbal Amir F, Liem Timothy K, Mitchell Erica L, Landry Gregory J, Moneta Gregory L
Department of Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Ore.
Department of Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Ore.
J Vasc Surg. 2014 Jul;60(1):129-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.01.013. Epub 2014 Mar 7.
It has been reported that a failed endovascular intervention adversely affects results of lower extremity bypass (LEB). We reviewed rates of prior endovascular intervention (PEI) in patients undergoing LEB with autologous vein for critical limb ischemia (CLI) to determine effects on graft patency, limb salvage, and amputation-free survival.
Retrospective review was conducted of consecutive autologous vein LEBs performed for CLI between 2005 and 2012 at a tertiary care academic medical center.
Overall, 314 autologous vein LEBs were performed for CLI, 71% for tissue loss. TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus II type D or type C lesions were present in 62% and 25%, respectively. The great saphenous vein was used as a conduit in 83%, and the distal target was infrapopliteal in 60%. The 30-day mortality rate was 3.5%. Primary patency rates at 1 year and 5 years were 61% and 45%. Secondary patency rates at 1 year and 5 years were 88% and 64%, with 23% requiring an intervention to maintain patency. The 5-year limb salvage rate was 89%, and the 5-year amputation-free survival was 49%. There were 61 patients (19%) who had undergone a PEI and 253 (81%) who underwent bypass with no prior endovascular intervention (NPEI). There were 19 iliac stents, 29 femoral interventions, 13 popliteal interventions, 9 crural interventions, 9 infrainguinal thrombectomies, and 13 infrainguinal thrombolyses. PEI and NPEI patients had similar demographics and prevalence of atherosclerotic risk factors. The 1-year primary patency rate was 62% for NPEI patients vs 59% for PEI patients (P = .759). The 1-year and 2-year secondary patency rates were 87% and 79% for NPEI patients vs 89% and 78% for PEI patients (P = .947). The 3-year limb salvage rate was 89% for NPEI patients vs 92% for PEI patients (P = .445). The 3-year amputation-free survival was 59% for NPEI patients vs 52% for PEI patients (P = .399). Median follow-up time was 323 days for NPEI patients (interquartile range, 83-918) vs 463 days for PEI patients (interquartile range, 145-946; P = .275).
Overall operative mortality, patency rates, and limb salvage for autologous vein LEB in CLI patients continue to be excellent in the endovascular era and are not necessarily affected by a prior ipsilateral endovascular procedure. Long-term survival remains poor in CLI patients requiring LEB.
据报道,血管内介入治疗失败会对下肢旁路移植术(LEB)的结果产生不利影响。我们回顾了因严重肢体缺血(CLI)接受自体静脉LEB治疗的患者先前血管内介入治疗(PEI)的发生率,以确定其对移植物通畅率、肢体挽救率和无截肢生存率的影响。
对2005年至2012年在一家三级医疗学术中心为CLI进行的连续自体静脉LEB进行回顾性研究。
总体而言,为CLI进行了314例自体静脉LEB,71%是因组织缺损。分别有62%和25%的患者存在《跨大西洋两岸血管外科学会共识II》D型或C型病变。83%使用大隐静脉作为血管通路,60%的远端目标位于腘动脉以下。30天死亡率为3.5%。1年和5年的原发性通畅率分别为61%和45%。1年和5年的继发性通畅率分别为88%和64%,其中23%需要进行干预以维持通畅。5年肢体挽救率为89%,5年无截肢生存率为49%。有61例患者(19%)接受过PEI,253例(81%)未接受过先前血管内介入治疗(NPEI)直接接受了旁路移植术。有19例髂动脉支架置入、29例股动脉介入、13例腘动脉介入、9例小腿动脉介入、9例腹股沟下血栓切除术和13例腹股沟下溶栓治疗。PEI组和NPEI组患者的人口统计学特征和动脉粥样硬化危险因素患病率相似。NPEI组患者1年原发性通畅率为62%,PEI组为59%(P = 0.759)。NPEI组患者1年和2年继发性通畅率分别为87%和79%,PEI组分别为89%和78%(P = 0.947)。NPEI组患者3年肢体挽救率为89%,PEI组为92%(P = 0.445)。NPEI组患者3年无截肢生存率为59%,PEI组为52%(P = 0.399)。NPEI组患者中位随访时间为323天(四分位间距,83 - 918天),PEI组为463天(四分位间距,145 - 946天;P = 0.275)。
在血管内介入时代,CLI患者自体静脉LEB的总体手术死亡率、通畅率和肢体挽救率仍然很高,不一定受先前同侧血管内手术的影响。需要LEB的CLI患者长期生存率仍然很低。