*Department of Ophthalmology, Oculoplastic and Orbital Surgery Service, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, Colorado; †Department of Ophthalmology, Oculoplastic, Facial Cosmetic, and Orbital Surgery Service, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin; ‡Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, Colorado, U.S.A.; §Oculoplastics and Orbit Division, King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; ‖Oculoplastics Division, Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, U.S.A.; On leave of absence from the ¶Craniofacial Unit of the Department of Ophthalmology, Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, School of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto-University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; and #Department of Ophthalmology, Oculoplastics, Lacrimal, and Orbital Surgery Service, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Mar-Apr;30(2):168-74. doi: 10.1097/IOP.0000000000000039.
This study reviews the clinical presentation and management of 11 cases of sino-orbital osteoma.
The medical records of patients with primary (originating from orbital bone) and secondary (originating from the paranasal sinuses) orbital osteoma from the academic practices of 4 surgeons (A.V.C., M.J.L., P.J.D., V.D.D.) were reviewed for clinical presentation and course, pathologic study, and radiologic reports. A Medline search of English-language literature on orbital osteomas was conducted for comparison with these findings.
Eleven cases of primary (1) and secondary (10) orbital osteoma were reviewed, with a mean follow up of 16 months. Seven patients were women. Ages ranged from 15-68 years, with a median of 40 years. Presenting complaints included slowly progressive globe displacement, palpable bony nodule, pain, and diplopia. Surgery was performed in 10 cases. Surgical approach varied according to location and size of each lesion and was performed in combination with otolaryngology and neurosurgery services as needed. Reconstruction included sculpting osteomatous bone to natural orbital contours, repair of orbital wall defects with implants, and obliteration of frontal sinus. Lesions demonstrated mixed compact, cancellous, and fibrous histologic subtypes.
Osteomas are the most common tumor of the paranasal sinuses (noted in up to 3% of coronal CT images), but secondary extension in or primary involvement of the orbit is rare. A variety of surgical approaches led to successful outcomes in this series. Complete surgical removal is not always necessary, and partial sculpting may relieve symptoms and cause less surgical morbidity in selected cases.
本研究回顾了 11 例鼻窦眶骨瘤的临床表现和治疗方法。
对 4 位外科医生(A.V.C.、M.J.L.、P.J.D.、V.D.D.)学术实践中患有原发性(起源于眶骨)和继发性(起源于副鼻窦)眶骨瘤的患者的病历进行回顾,以了解其临床表现和病程、病理研究和放射学报告。对英文文献中关于眶骨瘤的资料进行了检索,以便与这些发现进行比较。
共回顾了 11 例原发性(1 例)和继发性(10 例)眶骨瘤,平均随访时间为 16 个月。7 例为女性,年龄 15-68 岁,中位数为 40 岁。主要症状包括眼球缓慢移位、可触及的骨结节、疼痛和复视。10 例患者接受了手术治疗。手术入路根据每个病变的位置和大小而有所不同,必要时与耳鼻喉科和神经外科联合进行。重建包括雕刻骨瘤性骨以符合自然眶轮廓,用植入物修复眶壁缺损,并填充额窦。病变表现为混合性致密、松质和纤维组织学亚型。
骨瘤是鼻窦最常见的肿瘤(在冠状 CT 图像中可见高达 3%),但在眼眶中的继发性扩展或原发性累及较为罕见。本系列采用了多种手术入路,均取得了良好的效果。并非所有病例都需要完全切除,在某些情况下,部分雕刻可能会缓解症状并减少手术并发症。