Svabik K, Martan A, Masata J, El-Haddad R, Hubka P
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Apr;43(4):365-71. doi: 10.1002/uog.13305. Epub 2014 Mar 11.
To compare the efficacy of two standard surgical procedures for post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse in patients with levator ani avulsion.
This was a single-center, randomized interventional trial, of two standard surgical procedures for post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse: Prolift Total vs unilateral vaginal sacrospinous colpopexy with native tissue vaginal repair (sacrospinous fixation, SSF), during the period from 2008 to 2011. Entry criteria included at least two-compartment prolapse, as well as complete unilateral or bilateral levator ani avulsion injury. The primary outcome was anatomical failure based on clinical and ultrasound assessment. Failure was defined clinically, according to the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification system, as Ba, C or Bp at the hymen or below, and on translabial ultrasound as bladder descent to 10 mm or more below the lower margin of the symphysis pubis on maximum Valsalva maneuver. Secondary outcomes were evaluation of continence, sexual function and prolapse symptoms based on validated questionnaires.
During the study period, 142 patients who were post-hysterectomy underwent surgery for prolapse in our unit; 72 of these were diagnosed with an avulsion injury and were offered participation in the study. Seventy patients were randomized into two groups: 36 in the Prolift group and 34 in the SSF group. On clinical examination at 1-year follow-up, we observed one (3%) case of anatomical failure in the Prolift group and 22 (65%) in the SSF group (P < 0.001). Using ultrasound criteria, there was one (2.8%) failure in the Prolift group compared with 21 (61.8%) in the SSF group (P < 0.001). The postoperative POPDI (Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory) score for subjective outcome was 15.3 in the Prolift group vs 21.7 in the SSF group (P = 0.16).
In patients with prolapse after hysterectomy and levator ani avulsion injury, SSF has a higher anatomical failure rate than does the Prolift Total procedure at 1-year follow-up.
比较两种标准手术方法治疗肛提肌撕裂的子宫切除术后阴道穹窿脱垂患者的疗效。
这是一项单中心随机干预试验,于2008年至2011年期间,对两种标准手术方法治疗子宫切除术后阴道穹窿脱垂进行研究:全盆底重建术(Prolift Total)与单侧阴道骶棘韧带固定术联合自体组织阴道修复术(骶棘韧带固定术,SSF)。纳入标准包括至少两个腔室脱垂,以及完全单侧或双侧肛提肌撕裂伤。主要结局是基于临床和超声评估的解剖学失败。根据盆腔器官脱垂量化系统,临床将失败定义为处女膜或处女膜以下的Ba、C或Bp,经阴道超声检查为最大Valsalva动作时膀胱下降至耻骨联合下缘以下10mm或更多。次要结局是基于有效问卷对尿失禁、性功能和脱垂症状进行评估。
在研究期间,142例子宫切除术后患者在本单位接受了脱垂手术;其中72例被诊断为撕裂伤,并被邀请参加研究。70例患者被随机分为两组:全盆底重建术组36例,骶棘韧带固定术组34例。在1年随访的临床检查中,我们观察到全盆底重建术组有1例(3%)解剖学失败,骶棘韧带固定术组有22例(65%)(P<0.001)。根据超声标准,全盆底重建术组有1例(2.8%)失败,骶棘韧带固定术组有21例(61.8%)(P<0.001)。全盆底重建术组主观结局的术后盆腔器官脱垂困扰量表(POPDI)评分为15.3,骶棘韧带固定术组为21.7(P=0.16)。
在子宫切除术后伴有肛提肌撕裂伤的脱垂患者中,在1年随访时,骶棘韧带固定术的解剖学失败率高于全盆底重建术。