Zhang Xiao-Li, Qi Rui, Yan Jun-Tao
Zhongguo Zhen Jiu. 2013 Dec;33(12):1113-7.
To explore the optimized rehabilitation program in the treatment of post-stroke hemiplegia at the recovery stage.
Based on the randomized controlled principle, 60 patients were randomized into an rehabilita tion + massage group (group A) and an rehabilitation + acupuncture group (group B), 30 cases in each one. Bobath sport therapy and functional training were adopted in the two groups. In the group A, the massage therapy was added. The rolling method and palm-rubbing method were used on the affected side, the pressing, kneading and plucking methods were applied to Jianliao (LI 15), Jianzhen (SI 9), Quchi (LI 11), Huantiao (GB 30), Weizhong (BL 40), Chengshan (BL 57), Zusanli (ST 36) and the other acu points; and the nipping method was adopted at the twelve Jing-well points. In the group B, acupuncture was applied to Baihui (BL 20), Jianliao (LI 15), Quchi (LI 11), Shousanli (LI 10), Huantiao (GB 30), Yanglingquan (GB 34), Jiexi (ST 41) and the other acupoints. The treatment was given once a day, 5 treatments a week in the two groups. The efficacy was evaluated in 3 weeks. Fugl-Meyer scale, Barthel index (BI) score, modified Rankin scale and stroke-specific quality of life (SS-QOL) were used to assess the limb motor function, the activity of daily life (ADL), independent activity of life and the quality of life of the patients in the two groups before and after treatment. Based on the total cost and benefit, the health economics evaluation was conducted in the patients of the two groups.
The treatments all improved the limb motor function (group A: 26.00 (22) vs 37.00 (33); group B: 30.50 (21) vs 39.50 (36)), the independent activity of life, ADL (group A: 43.50 +/- 22.25 vs 57.50 +/- 22.25; group B: 52.83 +/- 16.59 vs 66.67 +/- 12.82) and the quality of life (group A: 122.23 +/- 30.00 vs 145.50 +/- 28.14; group B: 132.43 +/- 23.87 vs 151.47 +/- 22.37) in the patients of the two groups. The differences in all the indices were significant statistically before and after treatment in the two groups (all P<0.05). Above indices after treatment were not different obviously between the two groups (all P>0.05). In terms of health economics, the expense was decreased by RMB 688.48 while BI was increased by every 5 score in group A in comparison with the group B.
Both the rehabilitation and massage therapy and the rehabilitation and acupuncture therapy improve the limb motor function and the quality of life in the patients of post-stroke hemiplegia. The therapeutic efficacies are similar between the two therapeutic programs. The program of rehabilitation and massage is more economical in the aspects of ADL improvement, being advantageous at simple operation and low cost.
探讨脑卒中偏瘫恢复期的优化康复方案。
按照随机对照原则,将60例患者随机分为康复+推拿组(A组)和康复+针刺组(B组),每组30例。两组均采用Bobath运动疗法及功能训练。A组在此基础上加用推拿治疗,患侧采用滚法、揉法,对肩髎(LI 15)、肩贞(SI 9)、曲池(LI 11)、环跳(GB 30)、委中(BL 40)、承山(BL 57)、足三里(ST 36)等穴位及其他穴位采用按、揉、拨法;十二井穴采用捏法。B组对百会(BL 20)、肩髎(LI 15)、曲池(LI 11)、手三里(LI 10)、环跳(GB 30)、阳陵泉(GB 34)、解溪(ST 41)等穴位及其他穴位进行针刺。两组均每日治疗1次,每周治疗5次,3周后进行疗效评价。采用Fugl-Meyer量表、Barthel指数(BI)评分、改良Rankin量表及脑卒中特异性生活质量(SS-QOL)对两组患者治疗前后的肢体运动功能、日常生活活动能力(ADL)、生活自理能力及生活质量进行评估。基于总成本和效益,对两组患者进行卫生经济学评价。
两组治疗均改善了患者的肢体运动功能(A组:26.00(22)vs 37.00(33);B组:30.50(21)vs 39.50(36))、生活自理能力、ADL(A组:43.50±22.25 vs 57.50±22.25;B组:52.83±16.59 vs 66.67±12.82)及生活质量(A组:122.23±30.00 vs 145.50±28.14;B组:132.43±23.87 vs 151.47±22.37)。两组治疗前后各项指标差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。两组治疗后上述指标差异无明显统计学意义(均P>0.05)。在卫生经济学方面,与B组相比,A组每增加5分BI时费用降低688.48元。
康复推拿疗法和康复针刺疗法均能改善脑卒中偏瘫患者的肢体运动功能及生活质量。两种治疗方案疗效相似。康复推拿方案在改善ADL方面更经济,具有操作简单、费用低廉的优势。