• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

益生菌在癌症患者中的疗效和安全性:系统评价。

The efficacy and safety of probiotics in people with cancer: a systematic review.

机构信息

Hull York Medical School, York; Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, York.

Department of Paediatric Oncology and Haematology, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds; Paediatric Dietetic Department, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, UK.

出版信息

Ann Oncol. 2014 Oct;25(10):1919-1929. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdu106. Epub 2014 Mar 11.

DOI:10.1093/annonc/mdu106
PMID:24618152
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Probiotics are living microorganisms that are generally thought of as being beneficial to the recipient. They have been shown to be effective in people with acute infectious diarrhoea, and cost-effective in antibiotic-associated diarrhoea. Probiotics may have a role in people with cancer, as various cancer treatments often lead to diarrhoea. However, as people with cancer are often immunocompromised, it is important to assess for adverse events (AEs) such as infection, which could potentially be a consequence of deliberate ingestion of living microorganisms.

DESIGN

A systematic review was carried out to collect, analyse and synthesise all available data on the efficacy and safety of probiotics in people with cancer (PROSPERO registration: CRD42012003454). Randomised, controlled trials, identified through screening multiple databases and grey literature, were included for analysing efficacy, while all studies were included for the analysis of safety of probiotics. Primary outcomes were the reduction in duration, severity and incidence of antibiotic-associated diarrhoea and chemotherapy-associated diarrhoea, and AEs, especially probiotic-associated infection. Where possible, data were combined for meta-analysis by a random-effects model, assessing causes of heterogeneity, including differences in strains, dosage and patient characteristics.

RESULTS

Eleven studies (N = 1557 participants) were included for assessing efficacy. Results show that probiotics may reduce the severity and frequency of diarrhoea in patients with cancer and may reduce the requirement for anti-diarrhoeal medication, but more studies are needed to assess the true effect. For example comparing probiotic use to control 25 groups on effect on Common Toxicity Criteria ≥2 grade diarrhoea, odds ratio (OR) = 0.32 [95% confidence interval (CI) of 0.13-0.79; P = 0.01]. Seventeen studies (N = 1530) were included in the safety analysis. Five case reports showed probiotic-related bacteraemia/fungaemia/positive blood cultures.

CONCLUSIONS

Probiotics may be a rare cause of sepsis. Further evidence needs to be collated to determine whether probiotics provide a significant overall benefit for people with cancer.

摘要

背景

益生菌是通常被认为对接受者有益的活体微生物。它们已被证明对急性感染性腹泻患者有效,并且在抗生素相关性腹泻方面具有成本效益。益生菌可能在癌症患者中发挥作用,因为各种癌症治疗常常导致腹泻。然而,由于癌症患者通常免疫功能低下,因此评估不良反应(AE)非常重要,例如感染,这可能是故意摄入活体微生物的后果。

设计

进行了系统评价,以收集、分析和综合所有关于益生菌在癌症患者中的疗效和安全性的可用数据(PROSPERO 注册:CRD42012003454)。通过筛选多个数据库和灰色文献确定了随机对照试验,以分析疗效,同时所有研究均包括益生菌安全性分析。主要结局是减少抗生素相关性腹泻和化疗相关性腹泻的持续时间、严重程度和发生率,以及 AE,特别是益生菌相关性感染。在可能的情况下,通过随机效应模型对数据进行合并进行荟萃分析,评估异质性的原因,包括菌株、剂量和患者特征的差异。

结果

有 11 项研究(N = 1557 名参与者)纳入评估疗效。结果表明,益生菌可能减少癌症患者腹泻的严重程度和频率,并可能减少对止泻药物的需求,但需要更多研究来评估真实效果。例如,将益生菌使用与对照(25 组)比较对常见毒性标准≥2 级腹泻的影响,比值比(OR)= 0.32 [95%置信区间(CI)0.13-0.79;P = 0.01]。安全性分析共纳入 17 项研究(N = 1530)。5 例病例报告显示益生菌相关性菌血症/真菌血症/阳性血培养。

结论

益生菌可能是败血症的罕见原因。需要进一步收集证据来确定益生菌是否为癌症患者提供显著的整体益处。

相似文献

1
The efficacy and safety of probiotics in people with cancer: a systematic review.益生菌在癌症患者中的疗效和安全性:系统评价。
Ann Oncol. 2014 Oct;25(10):1919-1929. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdu106. Epub 2014 Mar 11.
2
Probiotics for the prevention of pediatric antibiotic-associated diarrhea.益生菌预防儿童抗生素相关性腹泻
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Dec 22(12):CD004827. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004827.pub4.
3
Probiotics for the prevention of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea in adults and children.用于预防成人和儿童艰难梭菌相关性腹泻的益生菌
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 19;12(12):CD006095. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006095.pub4.
4
Probiotics for the prevention of pediatric antibiotic-associated diarrhea.益生菌预防儿童抗生素相关性腹泻
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Nov 9(11):CD004827. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004827.pub3.
5
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.转移性皮肤黑色素瘤的全身治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD011123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2.
6
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
7
A systematic review and economic evaluation of epoetin alpha, epoetin beta and darbepoetin alpha in anaemia associated with cancer, especially that attributable to cancer treatment.促红细胞生成素α、促红细胞生成素β和达比加群酯治疗癌症相关性贫血(尤其是癌症治疗所致贫血)的系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2007 Apr;11(13):1-202, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta11130.
8
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
9
Probiotics for preventing urinary tract infections in adults and children.用于预防成人和儿童尿路感染的益生菌。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Dec 23;2015(12):CD008772. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008772.pub2.
10
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.

引用本文的文献

1
Potential Role of Oral Microbiota in Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw in Cancer Patients: A Narrative Review.口腔微生物群在癌症患者颌骨药物相关性骨坏死中的潜在作用:一项叙述性综述
Cureus. 2025 Aug 12;17(8):e89943. doi: 10.7759/cureus.89943. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Gut-Brain Axis in Mood Disorders: A Narrative Review of Neurobiological Insights and Probiotic Interventions.情绪障碍中的肠-脑轴:神经生物学见解与益生菌干预的叙述性综述
Biomedicines. 2025 Jul 26;13(8):1831. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13081831.
3
Probiotics and Cancer: Mechanistic Insights and Organ-Specific Impact.
益生菌与癌症:机制洞察及器官特异性影响
Biomolecules. 2025 Jun 16;15(6):879. doi: 10.3390/biom15060879.
4
Association between Dietary Live Microbe Intake and Periodontitis in Adults: Evidence from NHANES.成人饮食中摄入活微生物与牙周炎之间的关联:来自美国国家健康与营养检查调查(NHANES)的证据。
Oral Health Prev Dent. 2025 Jun 3;23:253-264. doi: 10.3290/j.ohpd.c_2026.
5
Selection, Comparative Genomics, and Potential Probiotic Features of Escherichia coli 5C, a pks-Negative Strain Isolated from Healthy Infant Donor Feces.从健康婴儿供体粪便中分离出的pks阴性菌株大肠杆菌5C的筛选、比较基因组学及潜在益生菌特性
Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins. 2025 Apr 16. doi: 10.1007/s12602-025-10522-5.
6
Exploring the dark side of probiotics to pursue light: Intrinsic and extrinsic risks to be opportunistic pathogens.探索益生菌的阴暗面以追求光明:作为机会性病原体的内在和外在风险。
Curr Res Food Sci. 2025 Mar 31;10:101044. doi: 10.1016/j.crfs.2025.101044. eCollection 2025.
7
Unlocking the power of probiotics, postbiotics: targeting apoptosis for the treatment and prevention of digestive diseases.释放益生菌、后生元的力量:针对细胞凋亡治疗和预防消化系统疾病。
Front Nutr. 2025 Mar 31;12:1570268. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1570268. eCollection 2025.
8
Operationalizing Team Science at the Academic Cancer Center Network to Unveil the Structure and Function of the Gut Microbiome.在学术癌症中心网络中实施团队科学以揭示肠道微生物组的结构与功能。
J Clin Med. 2025 Mar 17;14(6):2040. doi: 10.3390/jcm14062040.
9
Gerobiotics: Exploring the Potential and Limitations of Repurposing Probiotics in Addressing Aging Hallmarks and Chronic Diseases.老年生物学:探索重新利用益生菌来解决衰老特征和慢性疾病的潜力与局限性。
Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins. 2025 Mar 3. doi: 10.1007/s12602-025-10501-w.
10
Effect of dietary probiotics intake on cancer mortality: a cohort study of NHANES 1999-2018.饮食中摄入益生菌对癌症死亡率的影响:一项针对1999 - 2018年美国国家健康与营养检查调查(NHANES)的队列研究。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 6;15(1):959. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-83722-8.