Baharoon Salim, Alyafi Walid, Tamim Hani, Al-Jahdali Hamdan, Alsafi Eman, Al-Sayyari Abdullah, Ahmed Qanta
From the *King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh; †King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia; ‡Clinical Research Institute, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon; §Quality Management, King Saud Chest Specialty Hospital, Riyadh, Professor of Medicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia; ∥Professor of Medicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia; and ¶Associate Professor, State University of New York, New York.
J Patient Saf. 2016 Jun;12(2):108-13. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000097.
The aim of this study was to compare the impacts on patient outcomes of continuous versus on-demand access to certified consultant intensivists in the intensive care unit (ICU).
Two general adult ICUs within the same health-care organization were compared in terms of patient outcomes. One unit featured continuous mandatory presence of a consultant intensivist (unit A), whereas the other had continuous access to a consultant intensivist during daytime hours but only on-demand access during the night-time hours (unit B). The data collected from these 2 units over the same 12-month period included sex, age, APACHE II score, disease category (medical, surgical, or traumatic), ICU mortality, and length of stay. A subgroup analysis was undertaken to assess the impact of disease severity, age, sex, and disease category on mortality.
When adjusted for disease severity, mortality was significantly lower in unit A with continuous mandatory 24-hour presence of a consultant intensivist compared with unit B with on-demand access to a consultant intensivist after working hours. Old age, female sex, and a higher APACHE II score were associated with poorer outcomes at both sites. The subgroup analysis revealed that the difference in mortality was only significant among medical patients but not among surgical or trauma patients.
An improved survival rate was observed only among medical patients admitted to the ICU with mandatory continuous access to a consultant intensivist, despite the presence of greater disease severity in the population admitted to this unit.
本研究旨在比较重症监护病房(ICU)中持续配备与按需配备认证顾问重症医学专家对患者预后的影响。
对同一医疗机构内的两个普通成人ICU的患者预后进行比较。一个科室有顾问重症医学专家持续强制在岗(A科室),而另一个科室白天有顾问重症医学专家随时可及,但夜间仅按需配备(B科室)。在同一12个月期间从这两个科室收集的数据包括性别、年龄、急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统(APACHE II)评分、疾病类别(内科、外科或创伤性)、ICU死亡率和住院时间。进行亚组分析以评估疾病严重程度、年龄、性别和疾病类别对死亡率的影响。
在对疾病严重程度进行校正后,与工作时间后按需配备顾问重症医学专家的B科室相比,顾问重症医学专家24小时持续强制在岗的A科室死亡率显著更低。高龄、女性以及更高的APACHE II评分在两个科室均与较差的预后相关。亚组分析显示,死亡率差异仅在内科患者中显著,而在外科或创伤患者中不显著。
尽管入住该科室的患者疾病严重程度更高,但仅在强制持续配备顾问重症医学专家的ICU内科患者中观察到生存率有所提高。