Ragauskas Arminas, Bartusis Laimonas, Piper Ian, Zakelis Rolandas, Matijosaitis Vaidas, Petrikonis Kestutis, Rastenyte Daiva
Neurol Res. 2014 Jul;36(7):607-14. doi: 10.1179/1743132813Y.0000000308. Epub 2014 Jan 12.
To compare the diagnostic reliability of optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) ultrasonography with a transcranial Doppler (TCD)-based absolute intracranial pressure (ICP) value measurement method for detection of elevated ICP in neurological patients. The ONSD method has been only tested previously on neurosurgical patients.
A prospective clinical study of a non-invasive ICP estimation method based on ONSD correlation with ICP and an absolute ICP value measurement method based on a two-depth TCD technology has recruited 108 neurological patients. Ninety-two of these patients have been enrolled in the final analysis of the diagnostic reliability of ONSD ultrasonography and 85 patients using the absolute ICP value measurement method. All non-invasive ICP measurements were compared with 'Gold Standard' invasive cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pressure measurements obtained by lumbar puncture. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis has been used to investigate the diagnostic value of these two methods.
The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the ROC curve (AUC) of the ONSD method for detecting elevated intracranial pressure (ICP >14·7 mmHg) were calculated using a cutoff point of ONSD at 5·0 mm and found to be 37·0%, 58·5%, and 0·57, respectively. The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and AUC for the non-invasive absolute ICP measurement method were calculated at the same ICP cutoff point of 14·7 mmHg and were determined to be 68·0%, 84·3%, and 0·87, respectively.
The non-invasive ICP measurement method based on two-depth TCD technology has a better diagnostic reliability on neurological patients than the ONSD method when expressed by the sensitivity and specificity for detecting elevated ICP >14·7 mmHg.
比较视神经鞘直径(ONSD)超声检查与基于经颅多普勒(TCD)的绝对颅内压(ICP)值测量方法在检测神经科患者颅内压升高时的诊断可靠性。ONSD方法此前仅在神经外科患者中进行过测试。
一项前瞻性临床研究,采用基于ONSD与ICP相关性的无创ICP估计方法和基于双深度TCD技术的绝对ICP值测量方法,招募了108例神经科患者。其中92例患者纳入了ONSD超声检查诊断可靠性的最终分析,85例患者使用绝对ICP值测量方法。所有无创ICP测量值均与通过腰椎穿刺获得的“金标准”有创脑脊液(CSF)压力测量值进行比较。采用受试者操作特征(ROC)分析来研究这两种方法的诊断价值。
使用ONSD截断点为5.0mm计算ONSD方法检测颅内压升高(ICP>14.7mmHg)的诊断敏感性、特异性和ROC曲线下面积(AUC),分别为37.0%、58.5%和0.57。在相同的ICP截断点14.7mmHg下,计算无创绝对ICP测量方法的诊断敏感性、特异性和AUC,分别为68.0%、84.3%和0.87。
当以检测ICP>14.7mmHg升高的敏感性和特异性表示时,基于双深度TCD技术的无创ICP测量方法在神经科患者中的诊断可靠性优于ONSD方法。