Suppr超能文献

心房颤动患者的心脏再同步治疗:CERTIFY 研究(心房颤动患者心脏再同步治疗多国注册研究)。

Cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation: the CERTIFY study (Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Atrial Fibrillation Patients Multinational Registry).

机构信息

Electrophysiology and Pacing Unit, Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy.

Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Rennes, Rennes, France.

出版信息

JACC Heart Fail. 2013 Dec;1(6):500-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2013.06.003. Epub 2013 Oct 23.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study is to determine whether, in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), atrioventricular junction ablation (AVJA) is associated with a better outcome than treatment with rate-slowing drugs.

BACKGROUND

Different trials have demonstrated that CRT is effective in treating heart failure (HF) patients who are in sinus rhythm (SR). No trials have addressed whether CRT confers similar benefits on AF patients, with or without AVJA.

METHODS

The clinical outcomes of CRT for patients with permanent AF undergoing CRT combined with either AVJA (n = 443) or rate-slowing drugs (n = 895) were compared with those of SR patients (n = 6,046).

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 37 months. Total mortality (6.8 vs. 6.1 per 100 person-years) and cardiac mortality (4.2 vs. 4.0) were similar for patients with AF+AVJA and patients in SR (both p = NS). In contrast, the AF+drugs group had a higher total and cardiac mortality than the SR group and the AF+AVJA group (11.3 and 8.1, respectively; p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, AF+AVJA had total mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.93, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.74 to 1.67) and cardiac mortality (HR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.66 to 1.17) similar to that of the SR group, independent of known confounders. The AF+drugs group, however, had a higher total mortality (HR: 1.52, 95% CI: 1.26 to 1.82) and cardiac mortality (HR: 1.57, 95% CI: 1.27 to 1.94) than both the SR group and the AF+AVJA group (both p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term survival after CRT among patients with AF+AVJA is similar to that observed among patients in SR. Mortality is higher for AF patients treated with rate-slowing drugs.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定在接受心脏再同步治疗(CRT)的心房颤动(AF)患者中,房室结消融(AVJA)是否比使用减慢心率药物的治疗效果更好。

背景

不同的试验已经证明,CRT 对窦性节律(SR)心力衰竭(HF)患者有效。尚无试验探讨 AVJA 联合或不联合 AVJA 的 CRT 是否对 AF 患者有类似的益处。

方法

比较了永久性 AF 接受 CRT 联合 AVJA(n=443)或减慢心率药物(n=895)的 CRT 患者与 SR 患者(n=6046)的临床结局。

结果

中位随访时间为 37 个月。AF+AVJA 患者的总死亡率(每 100 人年 6.8 例 vs. 6.1 例)和心脏死亡率(4.2 例 vs. 4.0 例)与 SR 患者相似(均 p=NS)。相比之下,AF+药物组的总死亡率和心脏死亡率均高于 SR 组和 AF+AVJA 组(分别为 11.3 和 8.1,均 p<0.001)。多变量分析显示,AF+AVJA 的总死亡率(危险比[HR]:0.93,95%置信区间[CI]:0.74 至 1.67)和心脏死亡率(HR:0.88,95%CI:0.66 至 1.17)与 SR 组相似,不受已知混杂因素的影响。然而,AF+药物组的总死亡率(HR:1.52,95%CI:1.26 至 1.82)和心脏死亡率(HR:1.57,95%CI:1.27 至 1.94)均高于 SR 组和 AF+AVJA 组(均 p<0.001)。

结论

在接受 AVJA 的 AF+患者中,CRT 后的长期生存率与 SR 患者相似。接受减慢心率药物治疗的 AF 患者死亡率更高。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验