• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

右心室心尖部起搏与右心室流出道起搏时二尖瓣和三尖瓣反流的发生情况

Development of mitral and tricuspid regurgitation in right ventricular apex versus right ventricular outflow tract pacing.

作者信息

Hemayat Sevil, Shafiee Akbar, Oraii Saeed, Roshanali Farideh, Alaedini Farshid, Aldoboni Amirhossein Sami

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2014 Jun;40(1):81-6. doi: 10.1007/s10840-014-9878-y. Epub 2014 Mar 14.

DOI:10.1007/s10840-014-9878-y
PMID:24622930
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study aimed at comparing the development of tricuspid and mitral regurgitation between the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) and right ventricular apex (RVA) pacing.

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled 164 patients for permanent pacemaker implantation due to sick sinus syndrome or atrioventricular block and randomly divided them into two equal groups to receive either RVOT or RVA pacing. Patients with heart failure or valvular disease were excluded. The post-procedural echocardiographic evaluations were performed 1 year after the pre-procedural echocardiography, and the results were compared with respect to the development of mitral and tricuspid regurgitation and probable changes in the ejection fraction (EF).

RESULTS

Age, gender, pacing mode, and baseline cardiac rhythm did not significantly differ between the RVOT and RVA pacing groups. The incidence of mitral regurgitation was significantly higher in the RVA group (p = 0.03), but the incidence of tricuspid regurgitation was similar in both groups. There was a trend toward less tricuspid regurgitation in the RVOT group; however, it was not statistically significant. The mean EF was not significantly different between the study groups.

CONCLUSION

It seems that the incidence of mitral regurgitation in RVA pacing is significantly higher than that in RVOT pacing. The formation of tricuspid regurgitation needs to be discussed in the future.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

IRCT201103146061N1.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较右心室流出道(RVOT)起搏与右心室心尖部(RVA)起搏时三尖瓣和二尖瓣反流的发展情况。

方法

我们前瞻性纳入了164例因病态窦房结综合征或房室传导阻滞而行永久性起搏器植入术的患者,并将他们随机分为两组,每组人数相等,分别接受RVOT起搏或RVA起搏。排除患有心力衰竭或瓣膜疾病的患者。在术前超声心动图检查1年后进行术后超声心动图评估,并比较二尖瓣和三尖瓣反流的发展情况以及射血分数(EF)的可能变化。

结果

RVOT起搏组和RVA起搏组在年龄、性别、起搏模式和基线心律方面无显著差异。RVA组二尖瓣反流的发生率显著更高(p = 0.03),但两组三尖瓣反流的发生率相似。RVOT组有三尖瓣反流较少的趋势;然而,差异无统计学意义。研究组之间的平均EF无显著差异。

结论

似乎RVA起搏时二尖瓣反流的发生率显著高于RVOT起搏。三尖瓣反流的形成有待未来进一步探讨。

临床试验注册号

IRCT201103146061N1。

相似文献

1
Development of mitral and tricuspid regurgitation in right ventricular apex versus right ventricular outflow tract pacing.右心室心尖部起搏与右心室流出道起搏时二尖瓣和三尖瓣反流的发生情况
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2014 Jun;40(1):81-6. doi: 10.1007/s10840-014-9878-y. Epub 2014 Mar 14.
2
Right ventricular apex versus right ventricular outflow tract pacing: prospective, randomised, long-term clinical and echocardiographic evaluation.右心室心尖部起搏与右心室流出道起搏:前瞻性、随机、长期临床及超声心动图评估
Kardiol Pol. 2006 Oct;64(10):1082-91; discussion 1092-3.
3
Comparison of right ventricular apex and right ventricular outflow tract septum pacing in the elderly with normal left ventricular ejection fraction: long-term follow-up.老年左心室射血分数正常患者右心室心尖部与流出道间隔部起搏的比较:长期随访。
Kardiol Pol. 2012;70(11):1130-9.
4
Impact of Leadless Pacemaker Therapy on Cardiac and Atrioventricular Valve Function Through 12 Months of Follow-Up.无导线起搏器治疗对心脏和房室瓣功能的影响:12 个月随访结果。
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2019 May;12(5):e007124. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.118.007124.
5
Induction and aggravation of atrioventricular valve regurgitation in the course of chronic right ventricular apical pacing.在慢性右心室心尖起搏过程中诱导和加重房室瓣反流。
Europace. 2011 Nov;13(11):1587-90. doi: 10.1093/europace/eur198. Epub 2011 Jul 8.
6
Right ventricular outflow versus apical pacing in pacemaker patients with congestive heart failure and atrial fibrillation.充血性心力衰竭合并心房颤动起搏器植入患者右心室流出道起搏与心尖部起搏的比较
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2003 Nov;14(11):1180-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1540-8167.2003.03216.x.
7
Pacemaker-induced mitral regurgitation: prominent role of abnormal ventricular activation sequence versus altered atrioventricular synchrony.起搏器诱发的二尖瓣反流:异常心室激动顺序与房室同步性改变的突出作用。
Ital Heart J. 2001 Jun;2(6):441-8.
8
Comparison of left ventricular systolic function and mechanical dyssynchrony using equilibrium radionuclide angiography in patients with right ventricular outflow tract versus right ventricular apical pacing: A prospective single-center study.使用平衡放射性核素血管造影术比较右心室流出道起搏与右心室心尖部起搏患者的左心室收缩功能和机械性不同步:一项前瞻性单中心研究。
J Nucl Cardiol. 2015 Oct;22(5):903-11. doi: 10.1007/s12350-014-0033-z. Epub 2015 Jan 23.
9
Is right ventricular outflow tract pacing superior to right ventricular apex pacing in patients with normal cardiac function?在心脏功能正常的患者中,右心室流出道起搏优于右心室心尖部起搏吗?
Clin Cardiol. 2009 Dec;32(12):695-9. doi: 10.1002/clc.20677.
10
Effect of ventricular pacing lead position on tricuspid regurgitation: A randomized prospective trial.心室起搏导线位置对三尖瓣反流的影响:一项随机前瞻性试验。
Heart Rhythm. 2018 Jul;15(7):1009-1016. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2018.02.026. Epub 2018 Mar 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Tricuspid Regurgitation in the Setting of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices.心脏植入式电子设备相关的三尖瓣反流
Struct Heart. 2024 May 22;9(1):100319. doi: 10.1016/j.shj.2024.100319. eCollection 2025 Jan.
2
Evolution and prognosis of tricuspid and mitral regurgitation following cardiac implantable electronic devices: a systematic review and meta-analysis.心脏植入式电子设备后三尖瓣和二尖瓣反流的演变和预后:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Europace. 2024 Jul 2;26(7). doi: 10.1093/europace/euae143.
3
Tricuspid Regurgitation in Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction: Marker or Target?

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of right ventricular apex and right ventricular outflow tract septum pacing in the elderly with normal left ventricular ejection fraction: long-term follow-up.老年左心室射血分数正常患者右心室心尖部与流出道间隔部起搏的比较:长期随访。
Kardiol Pol. 2012;70(11):1130-9.
2
Induction and aggravation of atrioventricular valve regurgitation in the course of chronic right ventricular apical pacing.在慢性右心室心尖起搏过程中诱导和加重房室瓣反流。
Europace. 2011 Nov;13(11):1587-90. doi: 10.1093/europace/eur198. Epub 2011 Jul 8.
3
Right ventricular lead positioning does not influence the benefits of cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure and atrial fibrillation.
左心室收缩功能障碍中的三尖瓣反流:标志物还是靶点?
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Jun 28;8:702589. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.702589. eCollection 2021.
右心室导联位置并不影响心力衰竭伴心房颤动患者心脏再同步治疗的获益。
Europace. 2011 Dec;13(12):1747-52. doi: 10.1093/europace/eur193. Epub 2011 Jun 28.
4
The effects of right ventricular apical pacing on ventricular function and dyssynchrony implications for therapy.右心室心尖部起搏对心室功能及不同步性的影响:治疗的意义
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Aug 25;54(9):764-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.06.006.
5
Survival analysis in patients with preserved left ventricular function and standard indications for permanent cardiac pacing randomized to right ventricular apical or septal outflow tract pacing.
Circ J. 2009 Oct;73(10):1812-9. doi: 10.1253/circj.cj-09-0084. Epub 2009 Aug 19.
6
Right ventricular outflow tract septal pacing: long-term follow-up of ventricular lead performance.右心室流出道间隔起搏:心室导线性能的长期随访
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2009 Feb;32(2):172-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2008.02199.x.
7
Effect of right ventricular lead location on response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with end-stage heart failure.右心室电极位置对终末期心力衰竭患者心脏再同步治疗反应的影响。
Europace. 2009 Mar;11(3):356-63. doi: 10.1093/europace/eun375. Epub 2009 Jan 9.
8
Left ventricular dyssynchrony resulting from right ventricular apical pacing: relevance of baseline assessment.右心室心尖部起搏导致的左心室不同步:基线评估的相关性
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2008 Nov;31(11):1456-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2008.01209.x.
9
Long-term safety and efficacy of right ventricular outflow tract pacing in patients with permanent pacemakers.永久性起搏器患者右心室流出道起搏的长期安全性和有效性
Anadolu Kardiyol Derg. 2008 Oct;8(5):350-3.
10
ACC/AHA/HRS 2008 Guidelines for Device-Based Therapy of Cardiac Rhythm Abnormalities: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 Guideline Update for Implantation of Cardiac Pacemakers and Antiarrhythmia Devices): developed in collaboration with the American Association for Thoracic Surgery and Society of Thoracic Surgeons.《美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会/心律学会2008年心脏节律异常器械治疗指南》:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组(修订ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002年心脏起搏器和抗心律失常器械植入指南更新的写作委员会)报告:与美国胸外科协会和胸外科医师学会合作制定。
Circulation. 2008 May 27;117(21):e350-408. doi: 10.1161/CIRCUALTIONAHA.108.189742. Epub 2008 May 15.