Thompson Bastin Melissa L, Baker Stephanie N, Weant Kyle A
Department of Pharmacy, University of Kentucky HealthCare , Lexington, Kentucky .
Department of Pharmacy, University of Kentucky HealthCare , Lexington, Kentucky . ; Department of Emergency Services, University of Kentucky HealthCare , Lexington, Kentucky .
Hosp Pharm. 2014 Feb;49(2):177-83. doi: 10.1310/hpj4902-177.
Etomidate is a commonly used sedative during rapid sequence intubation (RSI). Septic patients are at an increased risk of independently developing adrenal suppression, which has been associated with increased mortality in some studies. Since etomidate affects cortisol production, its use in septic patients is controversial. However, data are still lacking to prove that etomidate should be avoided in this patient population.
The objective was to review patients diagnosed with sepsis who received etomidate during RSI. Our hypothesis is that patients who receive etomidate will experience clinically significant hypotension within the first 24 hours of intubation.
A retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients intubated in the emergency department (ED) and medical/surgical floors at our institution from 2004 to 2010. Once patients with a diagnosis of sepsis were identified, it was determined whether the patients received etomidate or a different sedative during intubation. The primary endpoint was clinically significant hypotension: systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg or mean arterial pressure <60 mm Hg.
One hundred fifty-seven patients, 110 etomidate and 47 non-etomidate, were included in the final analysis. Hypotension was seen in 79 (71.8%) patients who received etomidate and in 14 (29.8%) patients who received another sedative (P ≤ .001). There were no statistically significant differences in secondary objectives.
Etomidate use for induction of anesthesia during RSI was associated with clinically significant hypotension when compared to other sedatives. The hypotension was transient and did not translate into statistically significant differences in the secondary clinical endpoints.
依托咪酯是快速顺序诱导插管(RSI)期间常用的镇静剂。脓毒症患者独立发生肾上腺抑制的风险增加,在一些研究中这与死亡率增加相关。由于依托咪酯会影响皮质醇的产生,其在脓毒症患者中的使用存在争议。然而,仍缺乏数据证明应在这一患者群体中避免使用依托咪酯。
回顾在RSI期间接受依托咪酯治疗的脓毒症确诊患者。我们的假设是,接受依托咪酯的患者在插管后的头24小时内会出现具有临床意义的低血压。
对2004年至2010年在我院急诊科和内科/外科病房插管的患者进行回顾性队列研究。一旦确定脓毒症诊断的患者,确定患者在插管期间是否接受依托咪酯或其他镇静剂。主要终点是具有临床意义的低血压:收缩压<90mmHg或平均动脉压<60mmHg。
157例患者纳入最终分析,其中110例使用依托咪酯,47例未使用依托咪酯。接受依托咪酯的患者中有79例(71.8%)出现低血压,接受其他镇静剂的患者中有14例(29.8%)出现低血压(P≤0.001)。次要目标无统计学显著差异。
与其他镇静剂相比,RSI期间使用依托咪酯诱导麻醉与具有临床意义的低血压相关。低血压是短暂的,在次要临床终点上未转化为统计学显著差异。