Marwah Vikas, Barthwal M S, Rajput A K
Classified Specialist (Respiratory Medicine), Army Hospital (R&R), Delhi Cantt, India.
Commandant, Military Hospital Mhow, C/o 56 APO, India.
Med J Armed Forces India. 2014 Jan;70(1):22-5. doi: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2013.02.002. Epub 2013 Jul 8.
On most occasions treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis is started by physicians based predominantly on radiological opacities. Since these opacities may not be suggestive of active pulmonary tuberculosis and most of these opacities may even remain unchanged after complete treatment, starting treatment solely on the basis of these opacities may lead to ambiguous end points of cure. In view of this, study of misdiagnosis of radiological opacities as active pulmonary tuberculosis by physicians was undertaken in one of the respiratory centers of Armed Forces hospitals.
This was a prospective study of patients referred to our center for confirmation of active disease and institutional therapy. All patients who were diagnosed as pulmonary tuberculosis predominantly on radiological basis by physicians were evaluated for active pulmonary tuberculosis clinically, radiologically and microbiologically. Patients found to have inactive disease were followed for one year. At three monthly review, history, clinical examination, sputum AFB and chest radiographs were done.
There were 36 patients [all males, mean age: 36.9 years (range: 22-46 years)]. The most common initial presentation was of asymptomatic persons (33.3%) reporting for routine medical examination. The commonest radiological pattern was localized reticular opacities (52.8%)On follow up, only one patient was diagnosed to have pulmonary tuberculosis. The final diagnosis was consolidation in 6, bronchiectasis in 8, pulmonary tuberculosis in 1 and localized pulmonary fibrosis in 21 patients.
Diagnosing and treating tuberculosis predominantly on radiological basis is not appropriate and sputum microscopy and culture remains the cornerstone of diagnosing pulmonary tuberculosis.
在大多数情况下,肺结核的治疗由医生主要依据影像学上的不透明阴影开始。由于这些阴影可能并不提示活动性肺结核,而且其中大多数阴影在完成治疗后甚至可能保持不变,仅基于这些阴影开始治疗可能会导致治愈终点不明确。鉴于此,在一家武装部队医院的呼吸中心开展了关于医生将影像学不透明阴影误诊为活动性肺结核的研究。
这是一项对转诊至我们中心以确诊活动性疾病并接受机构治疗的患者的前瞻性研究。所有被医生主要基于影像学诊断为肺结核的患者都接受了临床、影像学和微生物学方面的活动性肺结核评估。被发现患有非活动性疾病的患者随访一年。在每三个月的复查时,进行病史、临床检查、痰涂片抗酸杆菌检查和胸部X光检查。
共有36例患者[均为男性,平均年龄:36.9岁(范围:22 - 46岁)]。最常见的初始表现是无症状者(33.3%)前来进行常规体检。最常见的影像学表现是局限性网状阴影(52.8%)。随访时,仅1例患者被诊断为肺结核。最终诊断为实变6例,支气管扩张8例,肺结核1例,局限性肺纤维化21例。
主要基于影像学诊断和治疗肺结核是不合适的,痰涂片显微镜检查和培养仍然是诊断肺结核的基石。