Nordahl Helene, Lange Theis, Osler Merete, Diderichsen Finn, Andersen Ingelise, Prescott Eva, Tjønneland Anne, Frederiksen Birgitte Lidegaard, Rod Naja Hulvej
From the aDepartment of Public Health, Section of Social Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; bDepartment of Public Health, Section of Biostatistics, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; cResearch Center for Prevention and Health, Glostrup University Hospital, Glostrup, Denmark; dDepartment of Cardiology and the Copenhagen City Heart Study, Bispebjerg University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark; eDanish Cancer Society Research Center, Institute of Cancer Epidemiology, Copenhagen, Denmark; and fDanish Health and Medicines Authority, Medical Public Health Office, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Epidemiology. 2014 May;25(3):389-96. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000080.
Differential exposures to behavioral risk factors have been shown to play an important mediating role on the education-mortality relation. However, little is known about the extent to which educational attainment interacts with health behavior, possibly through differential vulnerability.
In a cohort study of 76,294 participants 30 to 70 years of age, we estimated educational differences in cause-specific mortality from 1980 through 2009 and the mediating role of behavioral risk factors (smoking, alcohol intake, physical activity, and body mass index). With the use of marginal structural models and three-way effect decomposition, we simultaneously regarded the behavioral risk factors as intermediates and clarified the role of their interaction with educational exposure.
Rate differences in mortality comparing participants with low to high education were 1,277 (95% confidence interval = 1,062 to 1,492) per 100,000 person-years for men and 746 (598 to 894) per 100,000 person-years for women. Smoking was the strongest mediator for cardiovascular disease, cancer, and respiratory disease mortality when conditioning on sex, age, and cohort. The proportion mediated through smoking was most pronounced in cancer mortality as a combination of the pure indirect effect, owing to differential exposure (men, 42% [25% to 75%]; women, 36% [17% to 74%]) and the mediated interactive effect, owing to differential vulnerability (men, 18% [2% to 35%], women, 26% [8% to 50%]). The mediating effects through body mass index, alcohol intake, or physical activity were partial and varied for the causes of deaths.
Differential exposure and vulnerability should be addressed simultaneously, as these mechanisms are not mutually exclusive and may operate at the same time.
行为风险因素的差异暴露已被证明在教育程度与死亡率的关系中起重要的中介作用。然而,对于教育程度与健康行为之间通过差异易感性可能存在的相互作用程度,人们知之甚少。
在一项对76294名30至70岁参与者的队列研究中,我们估计了1980年至2009年特定病因死亡率的教育差异以及行为风险因素(吸烟、饮酒、体育活动和体重指数)的中介作用。通过使用边际结构模型和三向效应分解,我们同时将行为风险因素视为中间变量,并阐明了它们与教育暴露相互作用的作用。
男性中低教育程度与高教育程度参与者相比,每10万人年的死亡率差异为1277(95%置信区间=1062至1492),女性为每10万人年746(598至894)。在对性别、年龄和队列进行调整后,吸烟是心血管疾病、癌症和呼吸系统疾病死亡率的最强中介因素。通过吸烟介导的比例在癌症死亡率中最为明显,这是由于差异暴露导致的纯间接效应(男性为42%[25%至75%];女性为36%[17%至74%])和差异易感性导致的介导交互效应(男性为18%[2%至35%],女性为26%[8%至50%])共同作用的结果。通过体重指数、饮酒或体育活动的中介作用是部分性的,且因死亡原因而异。
应同时考虑差异暴露和易感性,因为这些机制并非相互排斥,可能同时起作用。