氰基丙烯酸酯皮肤保护剂在浅表皮肤损伤管理中的健康经济效益。
Health economic benefits of cyanoacrylate skin protectants in the management of superficial skin lesions.
作者信息
Woo Kevin Y
机构信息
School of Nursing, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
出版信息
Int Wound J. 2014 Aug;11(4):431-7. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12237. Epub 2014 Mar 16.
Abstract
Superficial skin damages, including stage II pressure ulcer, skin tears and moisture-associated skin damages (MASDs) are common and constitute a significant disease burden to the health care system. A cost analysis was conducted by comparing a cyanoacrylate barrier film with routine care in the treatment of superficial skin damages in a chronic care facility. The analysis included 12 patients: four patients with stage II pressure ulcers, six with MASD and two with skin tears. Cost analysis was conducted comparing the cost of care 7 days before and 7 days after the acrylate barrier was used. The total cost took into consideration the time, products and supplies required to manage the skin problem.
摘要
浅表性皮肤损伤，包括Ⅱ期压疮、皮肤撕裂伤和与潮湿相关的皮肤损伤（MASD）很常见，给医疗保健系统带来了重大疾病负担。在一家长期护理机构中，通过比较氰基丙烯酸酯隔离膜与常规护理在治疗浅表性皮肤损伤方面的效果进行了成本分析。该分析纳入了12名患者：4名Ⅱ期压疮患者、6名MASD患者和2名皮肤撕裂伤患者。通过比较使用丙烯酸酯隔离膜前后7天的护理成本进行成本分析。总成本考虑了处理皮肤问题所需的时间、产品和用品。
相似文献
1
Health economic benefits of cyanoacrylate skin protectants in the management of superficial skin lesions.氰基丙烯酸酯皮肤保护剂在浅表皮肤损伤管理中的健康经济效益。
Int Wound J. 2014 Aug;11(4):431-7. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12237. Epub 2014 Mar 16.
2
The cost of healing pressure ulcers across multiple health care settings.在多种医疗环境中治疗压疮的成本。
Adv Wound Care. 1996 Nov-Dec;9(6):18-22.
3
Clinical and economic benefit of enzymatic debridement of pressure ulcers compared to autolytic debridement with a hydrogel dressing.与水凝胶敷料的自溶性清创相比，酶清创在压疮治疗中的临床和经济效益。
J Med Econ. 2013 Jul;16(7):976-86. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2013.807268. Epub 2013 Jun 7.
4
Management of skin tears and stage II skin ulcers with two topical regimens: a study of cost minimization.
Adv Ther. 1996 Jan-Feb;13(1):10-9.
5
Integration of pressure ulcer treatment protocol into practice: clinical outcomes and care environment attributes.将压疮治疗方案融入实践：临床结果与护理环境属性
Outcomes Manag Nurs Pract. 2001 Jul-Sep;5(3):112-20.
6
Economics of pressure-ulcer care: review of the literature on modern versus traditional dressings.压疮护理的经济学：现代敷料与传统敷料相关文献综述
J Wound Care. 2007 Jan;16(1):5-9. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2007.16.1.26981.
7
The role of "wound burden" in determining the costs associated with wound care.“伤口负担”在确定伤口护理相关成本中的作用。
Ostomy Wound Manage. 2001 Mar;47(3):65-71.
8
[Clinical study using activity-based costing to assess cost-effectiveness of a wound management system utilizing modern dressings in comparison with traditional wound care].[使用作业成本法进行临床研究，以评估与传统伤口护理相比，采用现代敷料的伤口管理系统的成本效益]
Nihon Ronen Igakkai Zasshi. 2004 Jan;41(1):82-91. doi: 10.3143/geriatrics.41.82.
9
Foam dressings for treating pressure ulcers.用于治疗压疮的泡沫敷料。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 12;10(10):CD011332. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011332.pub2.
10
引用本文的文献
1
Management of Moisture-Associated Skin Damage: A Scoping Review.与水分相关的皮肤损伤的管理：一项范围综述。
Adv Skin Wound Care. 2017 Nov;30(11):494-501. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000525627.54569.da.
2
Skin Protectants Made of Curable Polymers: Effect of Application on Local Skin Temperature.可固化聚合物制成的皮肤保护剂：应用对局部皮肤温度的影响。
Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2017 Apr 1;6(4):109-114. doi: 10.1089/wound.2016.0705.
3
Exploration of pressure ulcer and related skin problems across the spectrum of health care settings in Ontario using administrative data.使用管理数据对安大略省医疗保健环境中各种压力性溃疡和相关皮肤问题进行研究。
Int Wound J. 2017 Feb;14(1):24-30. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12535. Epub 2015 Nov 20.
4
A laboratory comparison between two liquid skin barrier products.两种液体皮肤屏障产品的实验室对比
Int Wound J. 2014 Oct;11(5):561-6. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12325. Epub 2014 Jul 8.
本文引用的文献
1
Assessing the feasibility of subepidermal moisture to predict erythema and stage 1 pressure ulcers in persons with spinal cord injury: a pilot study.评估表皮下水分预测脊髓损伤患者红斑和1期压疮的可行性：一项试点研究。
J Spinal Cord Med. 2012 Jan;35(1):46-52. doi: 10.1179/204577211X13209212104141.
2
Pressure ulcer care and public policy: exploring the past to inform the future.压力性溃疡护理与公共政策：回顾过去，展望未来。
Adv Skin Wound Care. 2012 Feb;25(2):72-6. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000411407.20801.96.
3
Evaluation of a cyanoacrylate dressing to manage peristomal skin alterations under ostomy skin barrier wafers.评价一种氰基丙烯酸酯敷料在造口皮肤屏障片下管理造口周围皮肤改变的效果。
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2011 Nov-Dec;38(6):676-9. doi: 10.1097/WON.0b013e318234550a.
4
Pressure ulcer staging revisited: superficial skin changes & Deep Pressure Ulcer Framework©.压力性溃疡分期再探讨：浅表皮肤改变和深部压力性溃疡框架©。
Adv Skin Wound Care. 2011 Dec;24(12):571-80; quiz 581-2. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000408467.26999.6d.
5
An evaluation of the skin stripping of wound dressing adhesives.伤口敷料粘合剂的皮肤剥离评估。
J Wound Care. 2011 Sep;20(9):412, 414, 416-22. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2011.20.9.412.
6
Economic evaluation of pressure ulcer care: a cost minimization analysis of preventive strategies.压疮护理的经济评估：预防策略的成本最小化分析
Nurs Econ. 2009 Nov-Dec;27(6):390-400, 415.
7
Peristomal skin complications and management.造口周围皮肤并发症及其处理。
Adv Skin Wound Care. 2009 Nov;22(11):522-32; quiz 533-4. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000305497.15768.cb.
8
The ABCs of skin care for wound care clinicians: dermatitis and eczema.
Adv Skin Wound Care. 2009 May;22(5):230-6; quiz 237-8. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000350837.17691.7f.
9
Assessment and management of persistent (chronic) and total wound pain.持续性（慢性）和全伤口疼痛的评估与管理
Int Wound J. 2008 Jun;5(2):205-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2008.00483.x.
10
Results of nine international pressure ulcer prevalence surveys: 1989 to 2005.1989年至2005年九项国际压疮患病率调查结果。
Ostomy Wound Manage. 2008 Feb;54(2):40-54.
Zotero 插件