Schuurman Jaap-Peter, Schoonhoven Lisette, Defloor Tom, van Engelshoven Ilse, van Ramshorst Bert, Buskens Erik
St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
Nurs Econ. 2009 Nov-Dec;27(6):390-400, 415.
The purpose of this study was to determine the cost for prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers from a hospital perspective and to identify the least resource-intensive pressure ulcer prevention strategy. Cost analyses were examined from a hospital perspective using direct costs. The study was carried out alongside a prospective cohort study on the incidence and risk factors for pressure ulcers. Two large teaching hospitals in the Netherlands with (partly) opposing approaches in prevention, a technological versus a human approach, were analyzed. The main outcome measures were resource use, costs of preventive measures and treatment, and pressure ulcer incidence in both hospitals. Pressure ulcer prevention through a predominantly technical approach resulted in a similar incidence rate as prevention through a predominantly human approach. However, the technical approach was considerably less expensive.
本研究的目的是从医院角度确定预防和治疗压疮的成本,并确定资源消耗最少的压疮预防策略。从医院角度使用直接成本进行成本分析。该研究是与一项关于压疮发病率和危险因素的前瞻性队列研究同时进行的。对荷兰两家大型教学医院进行了分析,这两家医院在预防方面采用了(部分)相反的方法,一种是技术方法,另一种是人文方法。主要结局指标是两家医院的资源使用情况、预防措施和治疗成本以及压疮发病率。通过主要技术方法预防压疮的发病率与通过主要人文方法预防的发病率相似。然而,技术方法的成本要低得多。