Centre for Liver Research and National Institute for Health Research, Birmingham Liver Biomedical Research Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Centre for Liver Research and National Institute for Health Research, Birmingham Liver Biomedical Research Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Cytotherapy. 2014 Apr;16(4):545-59. doi: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2013.10.003.
Human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) can suppress inflammation; therefore their therapeutic potential is being explored in clinical trials. Poor engraftment of infused MSC limits their therapeutic utility; this may be caused by MSC processing before infusion, in particular the method of their detachment from culture.
Enzymatic methods of detaching MSC (Accutase and TrypLE) were compared with non-enzymatic methods (Cell Dissociation Buffer [CDB], ethylenediamine tetra-acetic acid and scraping) for their effect on MSC viability, chemokine receptor expression, multi-potency, immunomodulation and chemokine-dependent migration.
TrypLE detachment preserved MSC viability and tri-lineage potential compared with non-enzymatic methods; however, this resulted in near complete loss of surface chemokine receptor expression. Of the non-enzymatic methods, CDB detachment preserved the highest viability while retaining significant tri-lineage differentiation potential. Once re-plated, CDB-detached MSC regained their original morphology and reached confluence, unlike with the use of other non-enzymatic methods. Viability was significantly reduced with the use of ethylenediamine tetra-acetic acid and further reduced with the use of cell scraping. Addition of 1% serum during CDB detachment led to higher MSC numbers entering autophagy and increased MSC recovery after re-plating. TrypLE and CDB-detached MSC suppressed CD3(+)CD4(+)CD25(-) T-cell proliferation, although TrypLE-detached MSC exhibited superior suppression at 1:20 ratio. CDB detachment retained surface chemokine receptor expression and consequently increased migration to CCL22, CXCL12 and CCL4, in contrast with TrypLE-detached MSC.
This study demonstrates that non-enzymatic detachment of MSC with the use of CDB minimizes the negative impact on cell viability, multipotency and immunomodulation while retaining chemokine-dependent migration, which may be of importance in MSC delivery and engraftment in sites of injury.
人类骨髓间充质基质细胞(MSC)可抑制炎症;因此,它们的治疗潜力正在临床试验中得到探索。输注的 MSC 植入不良限制了其治疗用途;这可能是由于输注前 MSC 的处理,特别是其从培养物中分离的方法。
比较了酶法(Accutase 和 TrypLE)和非酶法(细胞解离缓冲液[CDB]、乙二胺四乙酸和刮擦)分离 MSC 的方法对 MSC 活力、趋化因子受体表达、多能性、免疫调节和趋化因子依赖性迁移的影响。
与非酶法相比,TrypLE 分离法可保持 MSC 活力和三系分化潜能;然而,这导致表面趋化因子受体表达几乎完全丧失。在非酶法中,CDB 分离法在保持高活力的同时保留了显著的三系分化潜能。与使用其他非酶法不同的是,CDB 分离后的 MSC 一旦重新接种,就会恢复其原有的形态并达到汇合。乙二胺四乙酸的使用显著降低了活力,而细胞刮除则进一步降低了活力。在 CDB 分离过程中添加 1%血清可导致更多的 MSC 进入自噬,并在重新接种后增加 MSC 的恢复。TrypLE 和 CDB 分离的 MSC 均可抑制 CD3(+)CD4(+)CD25(-)T 细胞增殖,但 TrypLE 分离的 MSC 在 1:20 比例下表现出更好的抑制作用。CDB 分离法保留了表面趋化因子受体的表达,因此与 TrypLE 分离的 MSC 相比,增加了对 CCL22、CXCL12 和 CCL4 的迁移。
本研究表明,使用 CDB 进行非酶法分离 MSC 可最大限度地减少对细胞活力、多能性和免疫调节的负面影响,同时保留对趋化因子依赖性迁移的影响,这在 MSC 输送和植入损伤部位时可能很重要。