OBJECTIVES

The sensitivity of periprosthetic tissue culture is inadequate for the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection (PJI). We investigated and compared the values of sonication fluid culture and periprosthetic tissue culture for diagnosing PJI.

METHODS

Included were patients whose joint prosthesis had been removed for any reason. The resulting sonication fluid and periprosthetic tissues were cultured for 14 days.

RESULTS

Of 231 explanted prostheses, aseptic failure was diagnosed in 162 cases (70%) and PJI in 69 (30%). In PJI cases, sonication fluid culture detected 62 microorganisms and periprosthetic tissue culture detected 45. Tissue and sonication fluid cultures showed sensitivities of 61% and 81%, respectively (p < 0.01), with specificity of 100% and 99%, respectively. On day 1, tissue and sonication fluid cultures were positive in 13% and 28% (p = 0.013) of PJI cases respectively, and on day 2, in 26% and 48% (p = 0.002) of cases. Four anaerobes grew in sonication fluid culture after 7-13 days incubation, whereas tissue culture missed 3 of these. Prolonged incubation of sonication fluid did not detect any organisms in the cases of aseptic failure.

CONCLUSIONS

Sonication fluid culture provides a more rapid diagnosis and detects about 30% more pathogens, although anaerobic organisms require up to 2 weeks of incubation.