Suppr超能文献

探讨糖尿病患者与非糖尿病患者中,冠状动脉病变复杂性对药物洗脱支架结局的影响:来自 18 项汇总随机试验的分析。

Impact of coronary lesion complexity on drug-eluting stent outcomes in patients with and without diabetes mellitus: analysis from 18 pooled randomized trials.

机构信息

Isala Klinieken, Zwolle, the Netherlands.

New York-Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York; Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, New York; Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 May 27;63(20):2111-2118. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.01.064. Epub 2014 Mar 13.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to investigate whether baseline lesion complexity affects drug-eluting stent (DES) outcomes according to diabetic status.

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have reported conflicting results regarding DES safety and efficacy in patients with and without diabetes mellitus (DM).

METHODS

Patient-level data from 18 prospective randomized trials were pooled. DES treatment outcomes in patients with versus without DM were analyzed in 2 propensity score-matched groups further stratified according to lesion complexity (American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association class A/B1 vs. B2/C). Remaining baseline differences were adjusted for by multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

DM was present in 3,467 of 18,441 patients (18.8%). DM was a predictor of 1-year repeat revascularization (target lesion revascularization: hazard ratio: 1.34; 95% confidence interval: 1.05 to 1.70; target vessel revascularization: hazard ratio: 1.40; 95% confidence interval: 1.15 to 1.72) and cardiac death or myocardial infarction (hazard ratio: 1.40; 95% confidence interval: 1.09 to 1.81). Rates of target lesion and target vessel revascularization were significantly higher in patients with versus those without DM with type B2/C lesions (8.0% vs. 4.5% and 10.6% vs. 5.9%, respectively, p < 0.0001 for both), but not in patients with only type A/B1 lesions (4.6% vs. 4.8%, p = 0.87, and 7.4% vs. 6.8%, p = 0.47, respectively), with a significant interaction between DM and lesion type observed for both endpoints (p = 0.01 and p = 0.02, respectively). No interaction was observed for death or myocardial infarction (p = 0.28).

CONCLUSIONS

In the DES era, patients with DM remain at increased risk for cardiac death or myocardial infarction. However, DM is a risk factor for repeat revascularization only in those patients with complex lesions; patients with DM and noncomplex lesions have similar rates of 1-year freedom from repeat revascularization as do patients without DM.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨基线病变复杂性是否会影响糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者的药物洗脱支架(DES)治疗结果。

背景

先前的研究报告了糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者使用 DES 的安全性和疗效结果存在矛盾。

方法

汇总了 18 项前瞻性随机试验的患者水平数据。在进一步根据病变复杂性(美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会 A/B1 级与 B2/C 级)进行倾向评分匹配的两组患者中,分析了有糖尿病和无糖尿病患者的 DES 治疗结果。通过多变量分析调整了剩余的基线差异。

结果

在 18441 例患者中,3467 例(18.8%)患有糖尿病。糖尿病是 1 年重复血运重建(靶病变血运重建:风险比:1.34;95%置信区间:1.05 至 1.70;靶血管血运重建:风险比:1.40;95%置信区间:1.15 至 1.72)和心源性死亡或心肌梗死(风险比:1.40;95%置信区间:1.09 至 1.81)的预测因素。B2/C 病变患者的靶病变和靶血管血运重建发生率明显高于无糖尿病患者(分别为 8.0%与 4.5%和 10.6%与 5.9%,p<0.0001),但 A/B1 病变患者无差异(分别为 4.6%与 4.8%,p=0.87 和 7.4%与 6.8%,p=0.47),两个终点均观察到糖尿病与病变类型之间存在显著交互作用(p=0.01 和 p=0.02)。未观察到死亡或心肌梗死的交互作用(p=0.28)。

结论

在 DES 时代,糖尿病患者发生心源性死亡或心肌梗死的风险仍然增加。然而,糖尿病仅在病变复杂的患者中是重复血运重建的危险因素;糖尿病伴非复杂病变的患者与无糖尿病患者的 1 年免于重复血运重建的比例相似。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验