• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

小儿肝脏裂伤和重症监护:评估 ICU 分诊策略。

Pediatric liver lacerations and intensive care: evaluation of ICU triage strategies.

机构信息

1Division of Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT. 2Division of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.

出版信息

Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2014 May;15(4):e183-91. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000000102.

DOI:10.1097/PCC.0000000000000102
PMID:24632581
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare PICU admission criteria following blunt traumatic liver laceration based on CT grade and/or physiologic instability with actual practice to improve efficiency of ICU admission.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Patients with grade 3-6 liver lacerations, 2002-2010.

PATIENTS

Hundred seventy-one infants and children, ages 1 month to 17 years.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Preadmission signs of physiologic instability (i.e., coma and cardiac arrest), liver CT grading, and outcomes including length of stay and packed RBC transfusion after admission to ICU were collected. Multiple body region severe trauma was defined as more than or equal to 1 extra-abdominal body area abbreviated injury score more than or equal to 4. Actual ICU admissions were compared with predicted. Two patients died before ICU admission and five (3%) died afterward. Of 169 patients, 52 (31%) were initially admitted to the inpatient ward. Five percent received surgical care for liver injury. Twenty percent received packed RBCs emergently for shock, whereas 5% received their first packed RBCs after admission. Compared with ICU admissions, ward patients were significantly older, had lower Injury Severity Scores, and less operative care. Among ICU patients, transfusion for hemorrhagic shock was significantly associated with more severe injury scores. Sixty percent of ICU patients were not transfused. ICU triage determined by signs of physiologic instability predicted 53 admissions (31%) including seven of nine patients (78%) treated with transfusions after admission. Predicted ICU admission for nontransfused patients was lower-9%. Adding CT laceration grade more than or equal to 4 increased ICU admissions to 129 (76%). Among surviving ICU patients, 37 of 62 patients (60%) with isolated severe abdominal trauma and no systemic instability had ICU length of stay less than 1 day.

CONCLUSIONS

Children with isolated abdominal injury and no physiologic instability can generally be treated without ICU admission. Adding grade more than or equal to 4 to usual ICU admission criteria resulted in excessive admission of stable patients.

摘要

目的

比较钝性肝外伤根据 CT 分级和/或生理不稳定的小儿重症监护病房(PICU)入院标准与实际实践,以提高 ICU 入院效率。

设计

回顾性队列研究。

地点

2002 年至 2010 年间,3-6 级肝裂伤患儿。

患者

171 名年龄 1 个月至 17 岁的婴儿和儿童。

干预措施

无。

测量和主要结果

收集入院前生理不稳定(即昏迷和心脏骤停)的迹象、肝 CT 分级以及包括 ICU 入院后住院时间和红细胞压积输注的结局。多处严重创伤定义为超过或等于 1 个腹部以外身体区域缩写损伤评分大于或等于 4。实际 ICU 入院与预测进行比较。2 例患者在 ICU 入院前死亡,5 例(3%)在入院后死亡。169 例患者中,52 例(31%)最初被收治在住院病房。5%的患者因肝损伤接受手术治疗。20%的患者因休克紧急接受红细胞压积输注,而 5%的患者在入院后首次接受红细胞压积输注。与 ICU 入院患者相比,病房患者年龄明显较大,损伤严重程度评分较低,手术治疗较少。在 ICU 患者中,出血性休克输血与更严重的损伤评分显著相关。60%的 ICU 患者未输血。由生理不稳定迹象确定的 ICU 分诊预测 53 例(31%)包括入院后接受输血的 9 例患者中的 7 例(78%)。预测未输血患者的 ICU 入院率较低为 9%。添加 CT 撕裂分级大于或等于 4 使 ICU 入院人数增加到 129 人(76%)。在幸存的 ICU 患者中,37 例孤立性严重腹部创伤且无全身不稳定的患者 ICU 住院时间小于 1 天。

结论

孤立性腹部损伤且无生理不稳定的儿童通常可以不入院治疗。将大于或等于 4 级的分级添加到常规 ICU 入院标准中,导致稳定患者的过度入院。

相似文献

1
Pediatric liver lacerations and intensive care: evaluation of ICU triage strategies.小儿肝脏裂伤和重症监护:评估 ICU 分诊策略。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2014 May;15(4):e183-91. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000000102.
2
RBC transfusions in children requiring intensive care admission after traumatic injury*.创伤性损伤后需要入住重症监护病房的儿童的红细胞输血*
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2014 Sep;15(7):e306-13. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000000192.
3
Significance of 'blush' on computed tomography scan in children with liver injury.
J Pediatr Surg. 2003 Mar;38(3):363-6; discussion 363-6. doi: 10.1053/jpsu.2003.50109.
4
Can we safely decrease intensive care unit admissions for children with high grade isolated solid organ injuries? Using the shock index, pediatric age-adjusted and hematocrit to modify APSA admission guidelines.对于患有高度孤立性实体器官损伤的儿童,我们能否安全地减少重症监护病房的收治人数?利用休克指数、儿科年龄校正值和血细胞比容来修改美国小儿外科医师协会(APSA)的收治指南。
J Pediatr Surg. 2017 Jun;52(6):989-992. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.03.025. Epub 2017 Mar 16.
5
Nonoperative management of pediatric blunt hepatic trauma.小儿钝性肝外伤的非手术治疗
Am Surg. 2001 Feb;67(2):138-42.
6
Reduction of resource utilization in children with blunt solid organ injury.
J Pediatr Surg. 2019 Feb;54(2):354-357. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2018.10.066. Epub 2018 Oct 31.
7
Outcome of nonoperative management of blunt liver trauma.钝性肝外伤非手术治疗的结果
Saudi Med J. 2004 Mar;25(3):294-8.
8
Prospective results of a standardized algorithm based on hemodynamic status for managing pediatric solid organ injury.基于血流动力学状态的标准化算法管理小儿实体器官损伤的前瞻性研究结果。
J Am Coll Surg. 2001 Oct;193(4):347-53. doi: 10.1016/s1072-7515(01)01027-4.
9
Liver injuries in children: the role of selective non-operative management.儿童肝损伤:选择性非手术治疗的作用
Injury. 2006 Jan;37(1):66-71. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2005.07.013. Epub 2005 Oct 21.
10
Non-operative management of isolated solid organ injuries due to blunt abdominal trauma in children: a fifteen-year experience.儿童钝性腹部创伤所致孤立性实体器官损伤的非手术治疗:十五年经验
Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2004 Feb;14(1):29-34. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-815777.

引用本文的文献

1
Spectrum of paediatric blunt abdominal trauma in a tertiary care hospital in India.印度一家三级保健医院儿科钝性腹部创伤的范围。
Afr J Paediatr Surg. 2023 Jul-Sep;20(3):191-196. doi: 10.4103/ajps.ajps_14_22.
2
Blunt Abdominal Trauma in Children: A Review of 105 Cases.儿童钝性腹部创伤:105例病例回顾
J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg. 2023 Jan-Feb;28(1):48-53. doi: 10.4103/jiaps.jiaps_171_21. Epub 2023 Jan 10.
3
Follow-up strategies for patients with splenic trauma managed non-operatively: the 2022 World Society of Emergency Surgery consensus document.
非手术治疗脾外伤患者的随访策略:2022 年世界急诊外科学会共识文件。
World J Emerg Surg. 2022 Oct 12;17(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s13017-022-00457-5.
4
Characteristics and predictors of intensive care unit admission in pediatric blunt abdominal trauma.儿科钝性腹部创伤患者入住重症监护病房的特征和预测因素。
Pediatr Surg Int. 2022 Apr;38(4):589-597. doi: 10.1007/s00383-022-05067-5. Epub 2022 Feb 6.
5
Blunt Spleen and Liver Trauma.钝性脾和肝创伤。
J Pediatr Intensive Care. 2015 Mar;4(1):10-15. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1554983.
6
Correlating MDCT Liver Injury Grade and Clinical Outcome in Patients Without Significant Extra-hepatic Injury.无严重肝外损伤患者的MDCT肝脏损伤分级与临床结果的相关性
Indian J Surg. 2016 Aug;78(4):275-80. doi: 10.1007/s12262-015-1355-z. Epub 2015 Sep 28.