Why we need to acknowledge the multiple aims of advance care planning.
作者信息
Robins-Browne Kate
机构信息
The University of Melbourne.
出版信息
Hastings Cent Rep. 2014 Mar-Apr;44(2):3. doi: 10.1002/hast.272.
DOI:10.1002/hast.272
PMID:24634032
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Why we need to acknowledge the multiple aims of advance care planning.
Hastings Cent Rep. 2014 Mar-Apr;44(2):3. doi: 10.1002/hast.272.
2
The authors reply.
Hastings Cent Rep. 2014 Mar-Apr;44(2):4. doi: 10.1002/hast.273.
3
Cueing "the conversation".
Hastings Cent Rep. 2013 Jul-Aug;43(4):29-30. doi: 10.1002/hast.191.
4
The "good planning panel".
Hastings Cent Rep. 2013 Jul-Aug;43(4):30-2. doi: 10.1002/hast.192.
5
Avoiding a "death panel" redux.
Hastings Cent Rep. 2013 Jul-Aug;43(4):20-8. doi: 10.1002/hast.190.
6
The authors reply.
Hastings Cent Rep. 2014 Mar-Apr;44(2):4. doi: 10.1002/hast.274.
7
Patient autonomy and provider beneficence are compatible.
Hastings Cent Rep. 2013 Nov-Dec;43(6):6. doi: 10.1002/hast.222.
8
Patient autonomy and provider beneficence are compatible. The authors reply.
Hastings Cent Rep. 2013 Nov-Dec;43(6):6. doi: 10.1002/hast.223.
9
What's not being shared in shared decision-making?
Hastings Cent Rep. 2013 Jul-Aug;43(4):13-6. doi: 10.1002/hast.188.
10
End of life decision planning in the perioperative setting: the elephant in the room?
Br J Anaesth. 2015 Nov;115(5):648-50. doi: 10.1093/bja/aev209. Epub 2015 Jul 6.
引用本文的文献
1
Does facilitated Advance Care Planning reduce the costs of care near the end of life? Systematic review and ethical considerations.
Palliat Med. 2016 May;30(5):423-33. doi: 10.1177/0269216315601346. Epub 2015 Aug 20.
Zotero 插件