Suppr超能文献

肥胖患者应该接受非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术还是体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术?

Should obese patients undergo on- or off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting?

作者信息

Pullan Mark, Kirmani Bilal H, Conley Thomas, Oo Aung, Shaw Matthew, McShane James, Poullis Michael

机构信息

Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital, Liverpool, UK.

Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital, Liverpool, UK

出版信息

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015 Feb;47(2):309-15. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezu108. Epub 2014 Mar 14.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine if on- or off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) makes a difference to in-hospital mortality and long-term survival in obese patients.

METHODS

Analysis of consecutive patients on a validated prospective cardiac surgery database was performed for patients undergoing isolated CABG. Obesity was defined as a body mass index (BMI) >30 kg/m(2). Uni- and multivariate analyses were performed for in-hospital mortality and long-term survival. A propensity analysis was also performed.

RESULTS

The overall mortality rate was 2.1% (N = 284) for all cases, N = 13 369. The mortality rate for obese patients (N = 4289) was 2.3%, and for non-obese patients (N = 9080) it was 2.0%; P = 0.4. The median follow-up was 7.0 (interquartile range 4.1-10.1) years. Univariate analysis identified that in-hospital mortality was significantly lower in obese patients undergoing off-pump CABG; P = 0.01. No significant difference existed with regard to non-obese patients; P = 0.55. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis identified that off-pump CABG was associated with improved survival in obese patients; P = 0.01. Multivariate analysis of non-obese patients did not identify on- or off-pump CABG as a significant factor determining in-hospital mortality or long-term survival. Multivariate analysis of obese patients identified off-pump CABG as being associated with significantly reduced in-hospital mortality (odds ratio [OR] 0.56, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.34-0.93, P = 0.03), and significantly improved long-term survival (hazard ratio 0.81, 95% CI 0.67-0.98, P = 0.03). In-hospital mortality and long-term survival were significantly affected by the era of surgery, regardless of patients' BMI. Propensity matching of non-obese patients (N = 6088, 1:1 matching) did not identify on- or off-pump CABG as a significant factor determining in-hospital mortality or long-term survival. Propensity matching of obese patients (N = 2980, 1:1 matching) identified on-pump CABG as a significant factor determining in-hospital mortality (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.26-0.98, P = 0.04), but having no effect on long-term survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Univariate, multivariate and propensity matching suggest that obese patients undergoing CABG have reduced in-hospital mortality if they undergo revascularization with the off-pump technique.

摘要

目的

确定非体外循环或体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)对肥胖患者的住院死亡率和长期生存率是否有影响。

方法

对经过验证的前瞻性心脏手术数据库中接受单纯CABG的连续患者进行分析。肥胖定义为体重指数(BMI)>30kg/m²。对住院死亡率和长期生存率进行单因素和多因素分析。还进行了倾向分析。

结果

所有病例(N = 13369)的总死亡率为2.1%(N = 284)。肥胖患者(N = 4289)的死亡率为2.3%,非肥胖患者(N = 9080)的死亡率为2.0%;P = 0.4。中位随访时间为7.0(四分位间距4.1 - 10.1)年。单因素分析表明,接受非体外循环CABG的肥胖患者住院死亡率显著较低;P = 0.01。非肥胖患者无显著差异;P = 0.55。Kaplan-Meier生存分析表明,非体外循环CABG与肥胖患者生存率提高相关;P = 0.01。非肥胖患者的多因素分析未将体外循环或非体外循环CABG确定为决定住院死亡率或长期生存率的重要因素。肥胖患者的多因素分析确定非体外循环CABG与住院死亡率显著降低相关(比值比[OR] 0.56,95%置信区间[CI] 0.34 - 0.93,P = 0.03)以及长期生存率显著提高相关(风险比0.81,95% CI 0.67 - 0.98,P = 0.03)。无论患者BMI如何,住院死亡率和长期生存率均受手术时代的显著影响。非肥胖患者(N = 6088,1:1匹配)的倾向匹配未将体外循环或非体外循环CABG确定为决定住院死亡率或长期生存率的重要因素。肥胖患者(N = 2980,1:1匹配)的倾向匹配确定体外循环CABG是决定住院死亡率的重要因素(OR 0.50,95% CI 0.26 - 0.98,P = 0.04),但对长期生存率无影响。

结论

单因素、多因素和倾向匹配表明,接受CABG的肥胖患者采用非体外循环技术进行血运重建时住院死亡率降低。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验