Qazi Yureeda, Hamrah Pedram
Ocular Surface and Imaging Center & Cornea Service Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Ocular Surface and Imaging Center & Cornea Service Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA ; Schepens Eye Research Institute, Massachusetts Eye & Ear, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
J Clin Cell Immunol. 2013 Nov 20;2013(Suppl 9). doi: 10.4172/2155-9899.S9-006.
Corneal transplantation is among the most successful solid organ transplants. However, despite low rejection rates of grafts in the 'low-risk' setting, rejection can be as high as 70% when grafted into 'high-risk' recipient beds. Under normal homeostatic conditions, the avascular cornea provides a unique environment that facilitates immune and angiogenic privilege. An imbalance in pro-inflammatory, angiogenic and lymphangiogenic mediators leads to a breakdown in corneal immune privilege with a consequent host response against the donor graft. Recent developments in lamellar and endothelial keratoplasties have reduced the rates of graft rejection even more, while providing improved visual outcomes. The corneal layer against which an immune response is initiated, largely determines reversibility of the acute episode. While epithelial and stromal graft rejection may be treated with topical corticosteroids with higher success, acute endothelial rejection mandates a more aggressive approach to therapy due to the lack of regenerative capacity of this layer. However, current immunosuppressive regimens come with the caveat of ocular and systemic side effects, making prolonged aggressive treatment undesirable. With the advent of biologics, efficacious therapies with a superior side effect profile are on the horizon. In our review we discuss the mediators of ocular immune privilege, the roles of cellular and molecular immune players in graft rejection, with a focus on human leukocyte antigen and antigen presenting cells. Furthermore, we discuss the clinical risk factors for graft rejection and compare rates of rejection in lamellar and endothelial keratoplasties to traditional penetrating keratoplasty. Lastly, we present the current and upcoming measures of therapeutic strategies to manage and treat graft rejection, including an overview of biologics and small molecule therapy.
角膜移植是最成功的实体器官移植之一。然而,尽管在“低风险”情况下移植物的排斥率较低,但移植到“高风险”受体床时,排斥率可能高达70%。在正常的稳态条件下,无血管的角膜提供了一个独特的环境,有利于免疫和血管生成特权。促炎、血管生成和淋巴管生成介质的失衡会导致角膜免疫特权的破坏,从而引发宿主对供体移植物的反应。板层角膜移植和内皮角膜移植的最新进展进一步降低了移植物排斥率,同时改善了视觉效果。引发免疫反应的角膜层在很大程度上决定了急性发作的可逆性。虽然上皮和基质移植物排斥反应可以通过局部使用皮质类固醇进行治疗,成功率较高,但由于该层缺乏再生能力,急性内皮排斥反应需要更积极的治疗方法。然而,目前的免疫抑制方案存在眼部和全身副作用的问题,使得长期积极治疗并不理想。随着生物制剂的出现,具有更好副作用特征的有效疗法即将出现。在我们的综述中,我们讨论了眼部免疫特权的介质、细胞和分子免疫参与者在移植物排斥反应中的作用,重点是人类白细胞抗原和抗原呈递细胞。此外,我们讨论了移植物排斥反应的临床风险因素,并比较了板层角膜移植和内皮角膜移植与传统穿透性角膜移植的排斥率。最后,我们介绍了目前和即将出现的管理和治疗移植物排斥反应的治疗策略措施,包括生物制剂和小分子疗法的概述。