Mendes D, Alves C, Batel-Marques F
CHAD - Centre for Health Technology Assessment and Drug Research, AIBILI - Association for Innovation and Biomedical Research on Light, Coimbra, Portugal; Central Portugal Regional Pharmacovigilance Unit, AIBILI - Association for Innovation and Biomedical Research on Light, Coimbra, Portugal; School of Pharmacy, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2014 Jun;39(3):307-13. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.12148. Epub 2014 Mar 17.
Despite being effective, the biologics approved for treating rheumatoid arthritis have been associated with serious adverse events. This study is aimed at comparing the safety profiles of adalimumab, etanercept and infliximab by analysing the disproportionalities of the associations between the different adverse events and the different biologics in the Portuguese spontaneous reporting database.
Adverse events spontaneously reported to the Portuguese pharmacovigilance system (PPS) between 2009 and 2011 were included. Adverse events were classified according to MedDRA in the primary system organ class. The reporting odds ratio (ROR) and its 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for each biologic regarding the various categories of adverse events. Microsoft Excel was used to perform all the calculations.
The PPS received 12167 adverse events reported for all drugs, of which 741 were reported for biologics: 157 for adalimumab, 132 for etanercept and 452 for infliximab. Compared with the all other drugs, adalimumab, etanercept and infliximab were all disproportionately associated with 'infections and infestations' (ROR: 6·65, 95% CI: 4·50-9·83; ROR: 2·74, 95% CI: 1·56-4·81; ROR: 2·95, CI 95%: 2·16-4·02, respectively) and with 'neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified' (ROR: 7·23, 95% CI: 3·92-13·33; ROR: 6·26, 95% IC: 3·12-12·57; ROR: 3·94, 95% CI: 2·41-6·44, respectively), etanercept with 'general disorders and administration site conditions' (ROR: 2·08, 95% CI: 1·44-3·02) and infliximab with 'immune system disorders' (ROR: 5·17, 95% CI: 3·50-7·64), 'respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders' (ROR: 1·80, 95% CI: 1·31-2·48) and 'investigations' (ROR: 1·82, 95% CI: 1·19-2·78). When interpreting the results one should take into consideration the number of patients exposed and should not only rely on the number of adverse events reported.
Although the disproportionalities found for adalimumab and etanercept may suggest strong associations with particular adverse events, caution is needed when drawing conclusions on the association between infliximab and the adverse events analysed. In the light of the present findings, these results deserve further evaluation.
尽管用于治疗类风湿性关节炎的生物制剂疗效显著,但已证实其与严重不良事件相关。本研究旨在通过分析葡萄牙自发报告数据库中不同不良事件与不同生物制剂之间关联的不成比例性,比较阿达木单抗、依那西普和英夫利昔单抗的安全性。
纳入2009年至2011年期间自发报告给葡萄牙药物警戒系统(PPS)的不良事件。不良事件根据MedDRA在主要系统器官类别中进行分类。针对每种生物制剂,计算各类不良事件的报告比值比(ROR)及其95%置信区间(CI)。所有计算均使用Microsoft Excel完成。
PPS共收到所有药物的12167例不良事件报告,其中生物制剂报告741例:阿达木单抗157例,依那西普132例,英夫利昔单抗452例。与所有其他药物相比,阿达木单抗、依那西普和英夫利昔单抗均与“感染和侵染”(ROR分别为:6.65,95%CI:4.50 - 9.83;ROR:2.74,95%CI:1.56 - 4.81;ROR:2.95,95%CI:2.16 - 4.02)以及“良性、恶性及未特定的肿瘤”(ROR分别为:7.23,95%CI:3.92 - 13.33;ROR:见上文,95%IC:3.12 - 12.57;ROR:3.94,95%CI:2.41 - 6.44)不成比例相关,依那西普与“全身性疾病及给药部位情况”(ROR:2.08,95%CI:1.44 - 3.02)相关,英夫利昔单抗与“免疫系统疾病”(ROR:5.17,95%CI:3.50 - 7.64)、“呼吸、胸及纵隔疾病”(ROR:1.80,95%CI:1.31 - 2.48)以及“检查”(ROR:1.82,95%CI:1.19 - 2.78)相关。在解释结果时,应考虑暴露患者的数量,而不应仅依赖报告的不良事件数量。
尽管阿达木单抗和依那西普发现的不成比例性可能表明与特定不良事件有强关联,但在得出英夫利昔单抗与所分析不良事件之间关联的结论时需谨慎。鉴于目前的研究结果,这些结果值得进一步评估。 (注:原文中“ROR: 6·26, 95% IC: 3·12-12·57”中的“IC”疑似错误,应为“CI”,译文按“CI”翻译)