Sloan Tod B, Toleikis J Richard, Toleikis Sandra C, Koht Antoun
Department of Anesthesiology, Anschutz Office West (AO1), MS 8202, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, 12631 E 17th Avenue, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA,
J Clin Monit Comput. 2015 Feb;29(1):77-85. doi: 10.1007/s10877-014-9571-9. Epub 2014 Mar 19.
Total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) with propofol and opioids is frequently utilized for spinal surgery when somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) and transcranial motor evoked potentials (tcMEPs) are monitored. Many anesthesiologists would prefer to utilize low dose halogenated anesthetics (e.g. 1/2 MAC). We examined our recent experience using 3% desflurane or TIVA during spine surgery to determine the impact on propofol usage and on the evoked potential responses. After institutional review board approval we conducted a retrospective review of a 6 month period for adult spine patients who were monitored with SSEPs and tcMEPs. Cases were included for the study if anesthesia was conducted with propofol-opioid TIVA or 3% desflurane supplemented with propofol or opioid infusions as needed. We evaluated the propofol infusion rate, cortical amplitudes of the SSEPs (median nerve, posterior tibial nerve), amplitudes and stimulation voltage for eliciting the tcMEPs (adductor pollicis brevis, tibialis anterior) and the amplitude variability of the SSEP and tcMEP responses as assessed by the average percentage trial to trial change. Of the 156 spine cases included in the study, 95 had TIVA with propofol-opioid (TIVA) and 61 had 3% expired desflurane (INHAL). Three INHAL cases were excluded because the desflurane was eliminated because of inadequate responses and 26 cases (16 TIVA and 10 INHAL) were excluded due to significant changes during monitoring. Propofol infusion rates in the INHAL group were reduced from the TIVA group (average 115-45 μg/kg/min) (p<0.00001) with 21 cases where propofol was not used. No statistically significant differences in cortical SSEP or tcMEP amplitudes, tcMEP stimulation voltages nor in the average trial to trial amplitude variability were seen. The data from these cases indicates that 1/2 MAC (3%) desflurane can be used in conjunction with SSEP and tcMEP monitoring for some adult patients undergoing spine surgery. Further studies are needed to confirm the relative benefits versus negative effects of the use of desflurane and other halogenated agents for anesthesia during procedures on neurophysiological monitoring involving tcMEPs. Further studies are also needed to characterize which patients may or may not be candidates for supplementation such as those with neural dysfunction or who are opioid tolerant from chronic use.
当监测体感诱发电位(SSEPs)和经颅运动诱发电位(tcMEPs)时,丙泊酚和阿片类药物的全静脉麻醉(TIVA)常用于脊柱手术。许多麻醉医生更倾向于使用低剂量的卤化麻醉剂(如1/2最低肺泡浓度)。我们研究了近期在脊柱手术中使用3%地氟醚或TIVA的经验,以确定其对丙泊酚使用量和诱发电位反应的影响。经机构审查委员会批准后,我们对6个月期间接受SSEPs和tcMEPs监测的成年脊柱患者进行了回顾性研究。如果麻醉采用丙泊酚-阿片类TIVA或根据需要补充丙泊酚或阿片类输注的3%地氟醚,则纳入研究病例。我们评估了丙泊酚输注速率、SSEPs的皮质波幅(正中神经、胫后神经)、诱发tcMEPs的波幅和刺激电压(拇短内收肌、胫前肌)以及通过每次试验变化的平均百分比评估的SSEP和tcMEP反应的波幅变异性。在纳入研究的156例脊柱病例中,95例采用丙泊酚-阿片类TIVA(TIVA组),61例采用3%地氟醚(吸入组)。排除3例吸入组病例,因为地氟醚因反应不足而停用,26例(16例TIVA组和10例吸入组)因监测期间有显著变化而被排除。吸入组的丙泊酚输注速率低于TIVA组(平均115 - 45μg/kg/min)(p<0.00001),有21例未使用丙泊酚。在皮质SSEP或tcMEP波幅、tcMEP刺激电压以及每次试验波幅变异性的平均值方面,未发现统计学上的显著差异。这些病例的数据表明,1/2最低肺泡浓度(3%)的地氟醚可与SSEP和tcMEP监测联合用于一些接受脊柱手术的成年患者。需要进一步研究以确认在涉及tcMEPs的神经生理监测手术中使用地氟醚和其他卤化剂进行麻醉的相对益处与负面影响。还需要进一步研究以确定哪些患者可能是或不是补充麻醉的候选者,例如那些有神经功能障碍或因长期使用阿片类药物而耐受的患者。