Suppr超能文献

利用实时光学监测技术比较凝血和 MIEX 预处理工艺对细菌和浊度的去除效果。

Comparison of coagulation and MIEX pre-treatment processes for bacterial and turbidity removal, utilizing real-time optical monitoring techniques.

出版信息

Environ Technol. 2014 Mar-Apr;35(5-8):1038-45. doi: 10.1080/09593330.2013.859737.

Abstract

Jar testing and flow cytometry were used in conjunction with photometric dispersion analysis (PDA) to assess conventional alum coagulation with and without magnetic ion exchange (MIEX) pre-treatment for turbidity and bacterial removal capacity. Treatment assessment included powdered activated carbon (PAC) and pre-chlorination of the MIEX-treated raw water. Floc particles were subjected to shear forces after settling and re-suspended to gauge bacterial release potential, floc breakage and re-aggregation. MIEX in conjunction with alum coagulation achieved improved coagulation as measured by PDA but did not increase bacterial log removal value (LRV) in comparison with conventional coagulation. Pre-chlorination and PAC addition were seen to improve bacterial removal and coagulation, respectively, but were less effective for bacterial LRVs when they were used in conjunction during coagulation.

摘要

使用Jar 测试和流式细胞术结合光度分散分析(PDA)来评估常规的明矾混凝处理,以及有无磁离子交换(MIEX)预处理对浊度和细菌去除能力的影响。处理评估包括粉末活性炭(PAC)和 MIEX 预处理原水的预氯化。在沉降和再悬浮后,絮体颗粒受到剪切力的作用,以衡量细菌释放潜力、絮体破碎和再聚集。MIEX 与明矾混凝相结合,通过 PDA 测量可实现更好的混凝效果,但与常规混凝相比,并未增加细菌对数去除值(LRV)。预氯化和 PAC 的添加分别被认为可以提高细菌去除率和混凝效果,但当它们在混凝过程中联合使用时,对细菌 LRV 的效果较差。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验