Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN 46285, USA.
Ann Gen Psychiatry. 2014 Mar 19;13(1):8. doi: 10.1186/1744-859X-13-8.
The objective of this research was to examine treatment patterns and health-care costs associated with second-step pharmacotherapy in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) who initiated monotherapy with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) in 2010.
This claims database study analyzed patients diagnosed with MDD who were prescribed a monotherapy SSRI, with the first prescription identified as the index date. Patients were required to be ≥18 years old, to have continuous insurance coverage from 1 year prior (pre-index) through 1 year post (post-index) from the index date, and to have not received an antidepressant in the pre-index period. The analyses are descriptive of the patient characteristics, initial SSRI prescribed, most commonly prescribed second-step therapies, and annualized health-care costs.
The identified patients (N = 5,012) were predominantly female (65.2%) with a mean age of 41.9 years. The most frequent index SSRIs were citalopram (30.1%) and sertraline (27.5%), and 52.9% of patients were prescribed a second-step pharmacotherapy during the post-index period. Add-on therapy occurred twice more frequently than switching treatments, with either anxiolytics (40.2%) or antidepressants (37.1%) as the most common classes of add-on pharmacological therapies. Patients who added a second medication or switched therapies had higher annualized medical costs compared with patients who continued their index SSRI or discontinued treatment.
For patients who were initially treated with an SSRI therapy, approximately half were prescribed a second-step treatment. In this comprehensive claims analysis, many of these patients experienced the addition of second medication, rather than switching to a new therapy. Given the type of medications used, it is possible that second-step interventions were targeted toward resolution of residual symptoms; however, this work is limited by the use of claims data without information on dosing or clinical symptoms, side effects, or response. Findings from this study set the expectation that physicians and patients will most likely need to partner for additional interventions in order to achieve remission.
本研究旨在考察 2010 年起始于选择性 5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRI)单药治疗的重度抑郁症(MDD)患者,在接受第二步药物治疗时的治疗模式和医疗保健费用。
本项基于理赔数据库的研究分析了起始 SSRI 单药治疗的 MDD 患者,以首次处方为索引日期。患者必须≥18 岁,在索引日期前(预索引)1 年至索引日期后(后索引)1 年内连续有保险覆盖,且在预索引期内未使用过抗抑郁药。分析包括患者特征、起始 SSRI 处方、最常开的第二步治疗方案和年度医疗保健费用。
所识别的患者(N=5012)中,女性占多数(65.2%),平均年龄为 41.9 岁。最常用的索引 SSRI 为西酞普兰(30.1%)和舍曲林(27.5%),52.9%的患者在后索引期内接受了第二步药物治疗。附加治疗的发生频率是换药的两倍,最常见的附加药物治疗为抗焦虑药(40.2%)或抗抑郁药(37.1%)。与继续使用索引 SSRI 或停止治疗的患者相比,添加第二种药物或换药的患者年度医疗费用更高。
对于初始接受 SSRI 治疗的患者,约有一半接受了第二步治疗。在这项全面的理赔分析中,许多患者接受了第二种药物的添加治疗,而不是转而使用新的治疗方法。鉴于所用药物的类型,第二步干预可能是针对缓解残留症状;然而,这项工作受到了仅使用理赔数据的限制,这些数据不包含剂量、临床症状、副作用或反应信息。本研究的结果表明,医生和患者很可能需要共同进行更多的干预,以实现缓解。