AstraZeneca Medical Department, Madrid, Spain.
Ann Gen Psychiatry. 2012 Aug 3;11(1):22. doi: 10.1186/1744-859X-11-22.
The aim of the study was to determine the most common treatment strategies and their costs for patients with an inadequate response to first-line antidepressant treatment (AD) in primary care.
A retrospective cohort study of medical records from six primary care centers was conducted. Adults with a major depressive disorder diagnosis, at least 8 weeks of AD treatment after the first prescription, and patient monitoring for 12 months were analyzed. Healthcare (direct cost) and non-healthcare costs (indirect costs; work productivity losses) were described.
A total of 2,260 patients were studied. Forty-three percent of patients (N = 965) presented an inadequate response to treatment. Summarizing the different treatment approaches: 43.2% were switched to another AD, 15.5% were given an additional AD, AD dose was increased in 14.6%, and 26.7% remained with the same antidepressant agent. Healthcare/annual costs were 451.2 Euros for patients in remission vs. 826.1 Euros in those with inadequate response, and productivity losses were 991.4 versus 1,842.0 Euros, respectively (p < 0.001).
Antidepressant switch was the most common therapeutic approach performed by general practitioners in naturalistic practice. A delay in treatment change when no remission occurs and a significant heterogeneity in management of these patients were also found.
本研究旨在确定初级保健中一线抗抑郁治疗(AD)应答不足患者的最常见治疗策略及其成本。
对来自六个初级保健中心的病历进行回顾性队列研究。分析患有重度抑郁症诊断、首次处方后至少接受 8 周 AD 治疗以及 12 个月患者监测的成年人。描述了医疗保健(直接成本)和非医疗保健成本(间接成本;工作生产力损失)。
共研究了 2260 名患者。43%的患者(N=965)对治疗反应不足。总结不同的治疗方法:43.2%的患者改用另一种 AD,15.5%的患者加用另一种 AD,14.6%的患者增加 AD 剂量,26.7%的患者继续使用相同的抗抑郁药。缓解患者的医疗保健/年成本为 451.2 欧元,而应答不足的患者为 826.1 欧元,生产力损失分别为 991.4 欧元和 1842.0 欧元(p<0.001)。
抗抑郁药转换是全科医生在自然实践中最常见的治疗方法。当没有缓解时治疗改变的延迟和这些患者管理的显著异质性也被发现。