Bhuyan Soumitra Sudip, Wang Yang, Opoku Samuel, Lin Ge
Dept. of Health Services Research & Administration, UNMC College of Public Health, 984350 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198-4350, USA.
J Cardiovasc Dis Res. 2013 Dec;4(4):209-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jcdr.2014.01.006. Epub 2014 Feb 22.
Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains a major cause of death and disability in the United States and worldwide. Despite the importance of surveillance and secondary prevention, the incidence of and mortality from AMI are not continuously monitored, and little is known about survival outcomes after 30 days of AMI hospitalization or associated risk factors, especially in the rural areas. The current study examines rural-urban differences in both in- and out-hospital survival outcomes for AMI patients.
We performed a retrospective analysis using hospital discharge data in Nebraska for January 2005 to December 2009 and Nebraska death certificate records through October 2011. Multivariate logistic regression was used to estimate the rural-urban difference in 30-day mortality. A Cox proportional hazard model was used to predict out-of-hospital and overall survival rate.
In the 30-day mortality model, after controlling for age, comorbidities, and rehabilitation, patients in urban areas were less likely to die than patients in rural areas (odds ratio: 0.709, 95% confidence interval: 0.626-0.802). In the overall survival model, patients in urban areas had a lower hazard of AMI death (hazard ratio: 0.86, 95% confidence interval: 0.806-0.931) than patients in rural areas. Patients with a previous history of heart failure had a significantly higher likelihood of 30-day mortality, while atrial fibrillation, heart failure, and chronic kidney disease were associated with lower overall survival. Patients who attended at least 1 cardiac rehabilitation session had significantly lower 30-day and overall mortality (p < 0.0001).
This study confirms previous findings on rural-urban disparities in 30-day mortality following AMI hospitalization, and reports new findings on overall rural-urban mortality disparity. The study also found an association between cardiac rehabilitation and reduced mortality, a finding never before reported at the population level. Further efforts are needed to develop systems in rural hospitals and communities to ensure that AMI patients receive recommended care.
在美国及全球范围内,急性心肌梗死(AMI)仍是导致死亡和残疾的主要原因。尽管监测和二级预防很重要,但AMI的发病率和死亡率并未得到持续监测,对于AMI住院30天后的生存结果或相关危险因素知之甚少,尤其是在农村地区。本研究探讨了AMI患者在院内外生存结果方面的城乡差异。
我们利用内布拉斯加州2005年1月至2009年12月的医院出院数据以及截至2011年10月的内布拉斯加州死亡证明记录进行了回顾性分析。采用多变量逻辑回归来估计城乡在30天死亡率方面的差异。使用Cox比例风险模型来预测院外和总体生存率。
在30天死亡率模型中,在控制年龄、合并症和康复情况后,城市地区的患者比农村地区的患者死亡可能性更低(优势比:0.709,95%置信区间:0.626 - 0.802)。在总体生存模型中,城市地区的患者发生AMI死亡的风险比农村地区的患者更低(风险比:0.86,95%置信区间:0.806 - 0.931)。有心力衰竭既往史的患者30天死亡率显著更高,而心房颤动、心力衰竭和慢性肾病与总体生存率较低相关。至少参加过1次心脏康复治疗的患者30天和总体死亡率显著更低(p < 0.0001)。
本研究证实了先前关于AMI住院后30天死亡率城乡差异的研究结果,并报告了关于城乡总体死亡率差异的新发现。该研究还发现心脏康复与降低死亡率之间存在关联,这一发现此前在人群层面从未有过报道。需要进一步努力在农村医院和社区建立系统,以确保AMI患者获得推荐的治疗。