Stec Sebastian, Śledź Janusz, Mazij Mariusz, Raś Małgorzata, Ludwik Bartosz, Chrabąszcz Michał, Śledź Arkadiusz, Banasik Małgorzata, Bzymek Magdalena, Młynarczyk Krzysztof, Deutsch Karol, Labus Michał, Śpikowski Jerzy, Szydłowski Lesław
Department of Cardiology, Medical Center for Postgraduate Education, Grochowski Hospital, Warsaw.
ELMedica EP-Network, Kielce.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2014 Aug;25(8):866-874. doi: 10.1111/jce.12414. Epub 2014 Apr 22.
Although the "near-zero-X-Ray" or "No-X-Ray" catheter ablation (CA) approach has been reported for treatment of various arrhythmias, few prospective studies have strictly used "No-X-Ray," simplified 2-catheter approaches for CA in patients with supraventricular tachycardia (SVT). We assessed the feasibility of a minimally invasive, nonfluoroscopic (MINI) CA approach in such patients.
Data were obtained from a prospective multicenter CA registry of patients with regular SVTs. After femoral access, 2 catheters were used to create simple, 3D electroanatomic maps and to perform electrophysiologic studies. Medical staff did not use lead aprons after the first 10 MINI CA cases.
A total of 188 patients (age, 45 ± 21 years; 17% <19 years; 55% women) referred for the No-X-Ray approach were included. They were compared to 714 consecutive patients referred for a simplified approach using X-rays (age, 52 ± 18 years; 7% <19 years; 55% women). There were 9 protocol exceptions that necessitated the use of X-rays. Ultimately, 179/188 patients underwent the procedure without fluoroscopy, with an acute success rate of 98%. The procedure times (63 ± 26 vs. 63 ± 29 minutes, P > 0.05), major complications (0% vs. 0%, P > 0.05) and acute (98% vs. 98%, P > 0.05) and long-term (93% vs. 94%, P > 0.05) success rates were similar in the "No-X-Ray" and control groups.
Implementation of a strict "No-X-Ray, simplified 2-catheter" CA approach is safe and effective in majority of the patients with SVT. This modified approach for SVTs should be prospectively validated in a multicenter study.
尽管已有报道称“近零射线”或“无射线”导管消融(CA)方法可用于治疗各种心律失常,但很少有前瞻性研究严格采用“无射线”的简化双导管方法对室上性心动过速(SVT)患者进行CA。我们评估了在这类患者中采用微创、非荧光透视(MINI)CA方法的可行性。
数据来自一项关于规则性SVT患者的前瞻性多中心CA登记研究。经股静脉穿刺后,使用两根导管创建简单的三维电解剖图并进行电生理研究。在前10例MINI CA病例之后,医护人员不再使用铅围裙。
共有188例被推荐采用无射线方法的患者纳入研究(年龄45±21岁;17%<19岁;55%为女性)。将他们与714例连续被推荐采用使用X射线的简化方法的患者进行比较(年龄52±18岁;7%<19岁;55%为女性)。有9例方案例外情况需要使用X射线。最终,179/188例患者在无荧光透视的情况下接受了该手术,急性成功率为98%。“无射线”组和对照组的手术时间(63±26 vs. 63±29分钟,P>0.05)、主要并发症(0% vs. 0%,P>0.05)以及急性(98% vs. 98%,P>0.05)和长期(93% vs. 94%,P>0.05)成功率相似。
在大多数SVT患者中,实施严格的“无射线、简化双导管”CA方法是安全有效的。这种改良的SVT治疗方法应在多中心研究中进行前瞻性验证。