Department of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital and the Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Europace. 2014 Feb;16(2):277-83. doi: 10.1093/europace/eut237. Epub 2013 Aug 8.
Non-fluoroscopic imaging (NFI) devices are increasingly used in ablations. The objective was to determine the utility of intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) in ablating paediatric supraventricular tachycardias (SVTs) and assess whether its integrated use with electroanatomic mapping (EAM) resulted in lower radiation exposure than use of EAM alone.
Prospective, controlled, single-centre study of patients (pts) age ≥10 years, weight ≥35 kg, with SVT and normal cardiac anatomy. Patients were randomized to ICE + EAM (ICE) or EAM only (no ICE). Both had access to fluoroscopy as needed. Eighty-four pts were enroled (42 ICE, 42 no ICE). Median age was 15 years (range 10.4-23.7 years); 57% had accessory pathways, 42% atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia. There was no difference in radiation dose (9 mGy ICE vs. 23 mGy no ICE, P = 0.37) or fluoroscopy time (1.1 min ICE vs. 1.5 min no ICE, P = 0.38). Transseptal punctures were performed in 25 pts (16 ICE, 9 no ICE), with ICE reducing radiation (8 mGy ICE vs. 62 mGy no ICE, P = 0.002) and fluoroscopy time (1.1 min ICE vs. 4.5 min no ICE, P = 0.01). Zero fluoroscopy was achieved in 13 pts (15% of total, 5 ICE, 8 no ICE), and low-dose cases (<50 mGy) in 57 pts (68% of total, 33 ICE, 24 no ICE). Acute success was 95% for ICE, 88% for no ICE.
Use of an integrated EAM/ICE system was no better than EAM alone in limiting radiation, but can be helpful for transseptal punctures. Given the low dose savings, use of ICE may be weighed against its financial cost. Low-fluoroscopy cases are performed in most NFI procedures.
非透视成像(NFI)设备在消融术中的应用越来越广泛。本研究旨在确定心内超声(ICE)在消融儿童室上性心动过速(SVT)中的应用价值,并评估其与电解剖标测(EAM)联合使用是否比单独使用 EAM 产生的辐射暴露更低。
这是一项前瞻性、对照、单中心研究,纳入年龄≥ 10 岁、体重≥ 35kg、SVT 合并正常心脏解剖结构的患者。患者随机分为 ICE+EAM(ICE 组)或仅 EAM(无 ICE 组)。两组均可根据需要使用透视。共纳入 84 例患者(ICE 组 42 例,无 ICE 组 42 例)。中位年龄为 15 岁(范围 10.4-23.7 岁);57%为旁路,42%为房室结折返性心动过速。两组的辐射剂量(ICE 组 9mGy 对比无 ICE 组 23mGy,P=0.37)或透视时间(ICE 组 1.1 分钟对比无 ICE 组 1.5 分钟,P=0.38)均无差异。25 例患者(16 例 ICE 组,9 例无 ICE 组)行经间隔穿刺,ICE 组可减少辐射(ICE 组 8mGy 对比无 ICE 组 62mGy,P=0.002)和透视时间(ICE 组 1.1 分钟对比无 ICE 组 4.5 分钟,P=0.01)。13 例(总例数的 15%,ICE 组 5 例,无 ICE 组 8 例)实现了无透视,57 例(总例数的 68%,ICE 组 33 例,无 ICE 组 24 例)为低剂量(<50mGy)。ICE 组的即刻成功率为 95%,无 ICE 组为 88%。
与 EAM 相比,集成 EAM/ICE 系统在限制辐射方面并没有优势,但对于经间隔穿刺可能有帮助。鉴于低剂量节省的效果,ICE 的使用可能需要权衡其经济成本。在大多数 NFI 手术中,都可以进行低透视手术。