• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

瑞典卫生技术评估(HTA)的监管治理视角

A regulatory governance perspective on Health Technology Assessment (HTA) in Sweden.

作者信息

Shah Sara Mehmood Birchall, Barron Anthony, Klinger Corinna, Wright John S F

机构信息

LSE Health, Department of Social Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE, United Kingdom.

LSE Health, Department of Social Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Health Policy. 2014 May;116(1):27-36. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2014.02.014. Epub 2014 Mar 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.healthpol.2014.02.014
PMID:24655685
Abstract

Independent regulatory agencies (IRAs) for Health Technology Assessment (HTA) are a key means by which national governments have responded to the challenge of ensuring equitable public access to a new range of medicines and treatment options within the context of limited national budgets for healthcare. In this paper, we apply a regulatory governance frame to the study of the Swedish process for HTA. Based on qualitative interviews with key institutional stakeholders, we suggest that the major challenge for Swedish IRAs for HTA is successfully communicating nationally produced research outputs to the regional authorities responsible for the delivery of health services. We conclude that a regulatory governance approach to the analysis of national processes for HTA has the capacity to draw attention to a new range of challenges and issues which have direct relevance to improving the conduct of HTA within national regulatory spaces.

摘要

卫生技术评估(HTA)的独立监管机构(IRA)是各国政府应对挑战的关键手段,即在国家医疗保健预算有限的情况下,确保公众公平获得一系列新的药品和治疗选择。在本文中,我们将监管治理框架应用于瑞典HTA流程的研究。基于对关键机构利益相关者的定性访谈,我们认为瑞典HTA的IRA面临的主要挑战是将国内产生的研究成果成功传达给负责提供卫生服务的地区当局。我们得出结论,对国家HTA流程进行分析的监管治理方法有能力引起人们对一系列新挑战和问题的关注,这些挑战和问题与改善国家监管范围内的HTA实施直接相关。

相似文献

1
A regulatory governance perspective on Health Technology Assessment (HTA) in Sweden.瑞典卫生技术评估(HTA)的监管治理视角
Health Policy. 2014 May;116(1):27-36. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2014.02.014. Epub 2014 Mar 2.
2
A regulatory governance perspective on health technology assessment (HTA) in France: the contextual mediation of common functional pressures.法国卫生技术评估(HTA)的监管治理视角:常见功能压力的情境调解
Health Policy. 2015 Feb;119(2):137-46. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2014.10.002. Epub 2014 Oct 14.
3
Policies for Use of Real-World Data in Health Technology Assessment (HTA): A Comparative Study of Six HTA Agencies.卫生技术评估(HTA)中真实世界数据的使用政策:六个HTA机构的比较研究
Value Health. 2017 Apr;20(4):520-532. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.12.003. Epub 2017 Jan 27.
4
Regulatory space and the contextual mediation of common functional pressures: analyzing the factors that led to the German Efficiency Frontier approach.监管空间与常见功能压力的情境中介:分析导致德国效率前沿方法的因素。
Health Policy. 2013 Mar;109(3):270-80. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.01.004. Epub 2013 Feb 4.
5
Historical development of health technology assessment in Thailand.泰国卫生技术评估的历史发展
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009 Jul;25 Suppl 1:241-52. doi: 10.1017/S0266462309090709. Epub 2009 Jun 16.
6
Development of archetypes for non-ranking classification and comparison of European National Health Technology Assessment systems.欧洲国家卫生技术评估系统非排名分类与比较的原型开发。
Health Policy. 2013 Dec;113(3):305-12. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.09.007. Epub 2013 Sep 25.
7
Interaction initiatives between regulatory, health technology assessment and coverage bodies, and industry.监管机构、卫生技术评估和覆盖机构以及行业之间的互动倡议。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2012 Oct;28(4):374-81. doi: 10.1017/S0266462312000591.
8
Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review.避免和识别健康技术评估模型中的错误:定性研究和方法学综述。
Health Technol Assess. 2010 May;14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. doi: 10.3310/hta14250.
9
Diffusion and use of health technology assessment in policy making: what lessons for decentralised healthcare systems?卫生技术评估在政策制定中的传播和应用:对分散的医疗保健系统有哪些借鉴意义?
Health Policy. 2012 Dec;108(2-3):194-202. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2012.09.017. Epub 2012 Oct 23.
10
Harmonization of HTA--based reimbursement and regulatory approval activities: a qualitative study.基于卫生技术评估的报销与监管审批活动的协调统一:一项定性研究
J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol. 2015;22(1):e78-89. Epub 2015 Feb 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of Health Policy Governance in the Introduction of the New DRG-Based Hospital Payment System from Interviews with Policy Elites in South Korea.评价韩国新基于疾病诊断相关分组的医院支付制度引入中的卫生政策治理:政策精英访谈
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 26;17(11):3757. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17113757.
2
Reimbursement Decisions for Pharmaceuticals in Sweden: The Impact of Disease Severity and Cost Effectiveness.瑞典药品报销决策:疾病严重程度和成本效益的影响
Pharmacoeconomics. 2015 Nov;33(11):1229-36. doi: 10.1007/s40273-015-0307-6.