• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

确定CT扫描所致电离辐射暴露的变化率:来自一家医院的数据库分析

Determining the rate of change in exposure to ionizing radiation from CT Scans: a database analysis from one hospital.

作者信息

Rayo Michael F, Patterson Emily S, Liston Beth W, White Susan, Kowalczyk Nina

机构信息

School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.

School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.

出版信息

J Am Coll Radiol. 2014 Jul;11(7):703-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2013.12.005. Epub 2014 Mar 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.jacr.2013.12.005
PMID:24656789
Abstract

PURPOSE

Cancer risks associated with radiation from CT procedures have recently received increased attention. An important question is whether the combined impact of CT volume and dose reduction strategies has reduced radiation exposure to adult patients undergoing CT examinations. The aim of this study was to determine differences in radiation exposure from 2008 to 2012 to patients receiving CT scans of the abdomen, head, sinus, and lumbar spine at a midwestern academic medical center that implemented dose reduction strategies.

METHODS

Data were collected from two internal data sets from 2008 to 2012 for general medicine and intensive care unit patients. These data were used to calculate annual CT volume, rate, average effective dose, radiation exposure, and estimated cancer risk.

RESULTS

A 37% reduction in abdominal CT volume was found from 2008 to 2012. However, no volume reductions were found for CT examinations of the head or lumbar spine, and the decrease in sinus imaging was minimal. Dose reduction strategies resulted in 30% to 52% decreases in radiation exposure for the targeted body areas. The combined reduction in volume and dose per procedure reduced estimated induced cancers by 63%.

CONCLUSIONS

Exposure to ionizing radiation from these examinations was reduced at one institution because of reduced volumes of procedures and the reduction of each procedure's effective dose through new protocols and technologies. Although both the volume reduction and dose reduction strategies contributed to the reduced exposure, it seems that investments in implementing the protocols and new technology had the greatest effect on future cancer risk.

摘要

目的

CT检查辐射相关的癌症风险近来受到更多关注。一个重要问题是,CT扫描量与剂量降低策略的综合影响是否降低了接受CT检查的成年患者的辐射暴露。本研究的目的是确定2008年至2012年期间,在一家实施了剂量降低策略的中西部学术医疗中心,接受腹部、头部、鼻窦和腰椎CT扫描的患者的辐射暴露差异。

方法

从2008年至2012年两个内部数据集收集普通内科和重症监护病房患者的数据。这些数据用于计算年度CT扫描量、扫描率、平均有效剂量、辐射暴露以及估计的癌症风险。

结果

2008年至2012年期间,腹部CT扫描量减少了37%。然而,头部或腰椎的CT检查扫描量未减少,鼻窦成像的减少幅度也很小。剂量降低策略使目标身体部位的辐射暴露减少了30%至52%。每次检查的扫描量和剂量的综合减少使估计的诱发癌症减少了63%。

结论

在一家机构中,这些检查的电离辐射暴露减少,这是因为检查量减少,以及通过新方案和新技术降低了每次检查的有效剂量。虽然扫描量减少和剂量降低策略都有助于减少暴露,但似乎实施方案和新技术的投入对未来癌症风险的影响最大。

相似文献

1
Determining the rate of change in exposure to ionizing radiation from CT Scans: a database analysis from one hospital.确定CT扫描所致电离辐射暴露的变化率:来自一家医院的数据库分析
J Am Coll Radiol. 2014 Jul;11(7):703-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2013.12.005. Epub 2014 Mar 19.
2
Bundling of abdomen/pelvis CT codes and change in ionizing radiation exposure.腹部/盆腔CT编码捆绑与电离辐射暴露的变化
J Am Coll Radiol. 2015 Jan;12(1):116. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2014.09.029.
3
The computerized tomography scans and their dosimetric safety.计算机断层扫描及其剂量学安全性。
Hell J Nucl Med. 2008 May-Aug;11(2):82-5.
4
CT radiation dose: current controversies and dose reduction strategies.CT 辐射剂量:当前的争议和剂量降低策略。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013 Dec;201(6):1283-90. doi: 10.2214/AJR.12.9720.
5
Authors' reply.作者回复。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2015 Jan;12(1):117. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2014.10.013.
6
Personalized technologist dose audit feedback for reducing patient radiation exposure from CT.用于减少CT检查中患者辐射暴露的个性化技术剂量审核反馈
J Am Coll Radiol. 2014 Mar;11(3):300-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2013.10.017.
7
Estimated radiation exposure and cancer risk from CT and PET/CT scans in patients with lymphoma.淋巴瘤患者CT和PET/CT扫描的估计辐射暴露及癌症风险
Eur J Radiol. 2014 Jun;83(6):1011-1015. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.02.015. Epub 2014 Feb 24.
8
Reducing emergency CT radiation doses with simple techniques: A quality initiative project.运用简单技术降低急诊CT辐射剂量:一项质量改进项目。
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2016 Feb;60(1):23-34. doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.12410. Epub 2015 Nov 23.
9
Whole-body PET/CT scanning: estimation of radiation dose and cancer risk.全身PET/CT扫描:辐射剂量估计与癌症风险评估
Radiology. 2009 Apr;251(1):166-74. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2511081300. Epub 2009 Feb 27.
10
[Results of the Austrian CT dose study 2010: typical effective doses of the most frequent CT examinations].[2010年奥地利CT剂量研究结果:最常见CT检查的典型有效剂量]
Z Med Phys. 2014 Sep;24(3):224-30. doi: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2013.12.005. Epub 2014 Jan 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient radiation safety in the intensive care unit.重症监护病房中的患者辐射安全。
Br J Radiol. 2025 Sep 1;98(1173):1335-1343. doi: 10.1093/bjr/tqaf147.
2
Radiation Overuse in Intensive Care Units.放射过度应用于重症监护病房。
Tomography. 2024 Jan 29;10(2):193-202. doi: 10.3390/tomography10020015.
3
PARTICIPATORY BULLSEYE TOOLKIT INTERVIEW: IDENTIFYING PHYSICIANS' RELATIVE PRIORITIZATION OF DECISION FACTORS WHEN ORDERING RADIOLOGIC IMAGING IN A HOSPITAL SETTING.参与式靶心工具包访谈:确定医院环境中医生在开具放射影像检查单时对决策因素的相对优先级。
Proc Int Symp Hum Factors Ergon Healthc. 2018 Jun;7(1):1-7. doi: 10.1177/2327857918071001. Epub 2018 Jun 29.
4
Radiation exposure to the patients in thoracic and lumbar spine fusion using a new intraoperative cone-beam computed tomography imaging technique: a preliminary study.使用新型术中锥形束计算机断层扫描成像技术对胸腰椎融合术患者的辐射暴露:初步研究。
Eur Spine J. 2017 Nov;26(11):2811-2817. doi: 10.1007/s00586-017-4968-z. Epub 2017 Feb 6.
5
Universal sinus computed tomography protocol for diagnostic imaging and intraoperative navigation.用于诊断成像和术中导航的通用鼻窦计算机断层扫描方案
Allergy Rhinol (Providence). 2015 Jan;6(3):146-50. doi: 10.2500/ar.2015.6.0134.