• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

受体年龄是否会影响原位心脏移植的功能结果?

Does recipient age impact functional outcomes of orthotopic heart transplantation?

机构信息

Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland.

Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland.

出版信息

Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 May;97(5):1636-42. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.12.048. Epub 2014 Mar 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.12.048
PMID:24656958
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study evaluated changes in physical functional performance after orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT) with particular attention to the impact of recipient age on functional outcomes.

METHODS

Retrospective review of all first-time, single-organ adult OHTs in the United States between 2005 and 2010. Patients were primarily stratified by age. The validated Karnofsky performance scale, which ranges from 0 (death) to 100 (fully independent with no evidence of disease and no complaints), was used to measure functional status.

RESULTS

A total of 10,049 OHT recipients were identified, with 1,431 (14%) aged 65 years or greater. Mean Karnofsky score prior to OHT was comparable between cohorts (younger: 50.7±25.2 versus older: 50.1±25.0; p=0.38). At a median follow-up of 2.1 years (interquartile range 0.7 to 3.3 years), 64% of OHT recipients had improved functional performance. The mean improvement in Karnofsky score was similar between younger and older patients (19.6±42.0 vs 17.5±41.8; p=0.10). Twenty percent of younger patients were functionally independent prior to OHT, with 67% being functionally independent at last follow-up (p<0.001). Similarly, in the older cohort, 20% were functionally independent prior to OHT, with 66% being functionally independent at last follow-up (p<0.001). Multivariable analysis adjusting for potential confounders confirmed that age, both as a continuous and categoric variable, did not impact odds of functional improvement after OHT. Subanalysis using 70 years as the age cutoff produced similar results.

CONCLUSIONS

In the modern era, OHT is associated with improvements in functional performance in most recipients, and this beneficial effect is preserved across the age spectrum. These data provide a benchmark for functional outcomes after OHT and may have important implications in organ allocation.

摘要

背景

本研究评估了同种异体心脏移植(OHT)后患者身体机能表现的变化,并特别关注受者年龄对功能结局的影响。

方法

回顾性分析了 2005 年至 2010 年期间美国首次接受单器官成人 OHT 的所有患者。患者主要按年龄分层。采用经过验证的卡诺夫斯基表现量表(Karnofsky performance scale)来衡量功能状态,该量表的范围为 0(死亡)至 100(完全独立,无疾病证据,无抱怨)。

结果

共确定了 10049 例 OHT 受者,其中 1431 例(14%)年龄在 65 岁或以上。OHT 前的平均卡诺夫斯基评分在两组间无差异(年轻组:50.7±25.2;年长组:50.1±25.0;p=0.38)。中位随访时间为 2.1 年(四分位距 0.7 至 3.3 年),64%的 OHT 受者的身体机能表现得到改善。年轻组和年长组的卡诺夫斯基评分平均改善程度相似(19.6±42.0 与 17.5±41.8;p=0.10)。OHT 前,20%的年轻患者为功能独立,最后一次随访时 67%为功能独立(p<0.001)。同样,在年长组中,OHT 前 20%的患者为功能独立,最后一次随访时 66%的患者为功能独立(p<0.001)。调整潜在混杂因素的多变量分析证实,年龄(连续变量和分类变量)均不会影响 OHT 后功能改善的几率。使用 70 岁作为年龄切点的亚组分析得出了类似的结果。

结论

在现代,OHT 与大多数受者的身体机能表现改善相关,且这种有益作用在整个年龄范围内得以保留。这些数据为 OHT 后的功能结局提供了基准,并可能对器官分配具有重要意义。

相似文献

1
Does recipient age impact functional outcomes of orthotopic heart transplantation?受体年龄是否会影响原位心脏移植的功能结果?
Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 May;97(5):1636-42. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.12.048. Epub 2014 Mar 20.
2
Outcomes in patients older than 60 years of age undergoing orthotopic heart transplantation: an analysis of the UNOS database.60岁以上患者原位心脏移植的结果:对器官共享联合网络(UNOS)数据库的分析
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2008 Feb;27(2):184-91. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2007.11.566.
3
Should orthotopic heart transplantation using marginal donors be limited to higher volume centers?边缘供体的原位心脏移植是否应仅限于高容量中心?
Ann Thorac Surg. 2012 Sep;94(3):695-702. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.03.069. Epub 2012 May 23.
4
Outcomes in bicaval versus biatrial techniques in heart transplantation: an analysis of the UNOS database.心脏移植中双腔静脉与双心房技术的结局:对器官共享联合网络(UNOS)数据库的分析
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2008 Feb;27(2):178-83. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2007.11.003.
5
Factors associated with 5-year survival in older heart transplant recipients.与老年心脏移植受者 5 年生存率相关的因素。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012 Feb;143(2):468-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.10.036.
6
Impact of bilateral versus single lung transplantation on survival in recipients 60 years of age and older: analysis of United Network for Organ Sharing database.双侧肺移植与单肺移植对60岁及以上受者生存的影响:器官共享联合网络数据库分析
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007 Feb;133(2):541-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.09.062. Epub 2007 Jan 10.
7
Should patients 60 years and older undergo bridge to transplantation with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices?60 岁及以上的患者是否应该通过持续血流左心室辅助装置进行桥接移植?
Ann Thorac Surg. 2012 Dec;94(6):2017-24. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.06.009. Epub 2012 Aug 2.
8
Institutional factors beyond procedural volume significantly impact center variability in outcomes after orthotopic heart transplantation.除了手术量以外,制度因素极大地影响了同种异体心脏移植术后中心间结果的变异性。
Ann Surg. 2012 Oct;256(4):616-23. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31826b4bc9.
9
Validation of the United States-derived Index for Mortality Prediction After Cardiac Transplantation (IMPACT) using international registry data.利用国际注册数据验证源于美国的心脏移植术后死亡率预测指数(IMPACT)。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2013 May;32(5):492-8. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2013.02.001. Epub 2013 Mar 7.
10
The influence of institutional volume on the incidence of complications and their effect on mortality after heart transplantation.机构容量对心脏移植后并发症发生率的影响及其对死亡率的影响。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2015 Nov;34(11):1390-7. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2015.05.014. Epub 2015 Jun 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Do age and functional dependence affect outcomes of simultaneous heart-kidney transplantation?年龄和功能依赖会影响心肾联合移植的结果吗?
JTCVS Open. 2023 Jun 29;15:262-289. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2023.05.016. eCollection 2023 Sep.
2
Optimal timing of heart transplantation in patients with an implantable left ventricular assist device.植入式左心室辅助装置患者心脏移植的最佳时机
Korean J Transplant. 2023 Jun 30;37(2):79-84. doi: 10.4285/kjt.23.0015. Epub 2023 Apr 17.
3
Patients 60 years of age and older should have the same chance for heart transplantation or not?
60岁及以上的患者应该有同样的心脏移植机会吗?
J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci. 2017 Feb;37(1):57-62. doi: 10.1007/s11596-017-1694-z. Epub 2017 Feb 22.