Lin Xin, Parthasarathy Krupakar, Surya Wahyu, Zhang Tong, Mu Yuguang, Torres Jaume
School of Biological Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, 60, Nanyang Drive, 637551, Singapore.
School of Biological Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, 60, Nanyang Drive, 637551, Singapore.
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014 Jul;1838(7):1777-84. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2014.03.006. Epub 2014 Mar 20.
Crystal (Cry) toxins are widely used for insect control, but their mechanism of toxicity is still uncertain. These toxins can form lytic pores in vitro, and water soluble tetrameric pre-pore intermediates have been reported. Even the precise oligomeric state of the toxin in membranes, trimeric or tetrameric, is still a debated issue. Based on previous reports, we have assumed that interactions between toxin monomers in solution are at least partly mediated by domain I, and we have analyzed in silico the homo-oligomerization tendencies of the domain I α-helices individually. Using many homologous sequences for each α-helix, our strategy allows selection of evolutionarily conserved interactions. These interactions appeared only in helices α3 and α5, but only α3 produced a suitably oriented or α-helical sample in lipid bilayers, forming homotetramers in C14-betaine, and allowing determination of its rotational orientation in lipid bilayers using site-specific infrared dichroism (SSID). The determined orientation in the tetrameric model is in agreement with only one of the evolutionarily conserved models. In addition mutation R99E, which was found to inhibit oligomerization experimentally, greatly destabilized the tetramer in molecular dynamic simulations. In this model, helix 3 is able to form inter-monomer interactions without significant rearrangements of domain I, which is compatible with the available crystal structure of Cry toxins in solution. The model presented here at least partially explains the reported tetrameric oligomerization of Cry toxins in solution and the inhibition of this oligomerization by a synthetic α3 peptide.
晶体(Cry)毒素被广泛用于害虫防治,但其毒性机制仍不明确。这些毒素在体外可形成裂解孔,并且已有报道称存在水溶性四聚体前体孔中间体。甚至毒素在膜中的精确寡聚状态,是三聚体还是四聚体,仍然是一个有争议的问题。基于先前的报道,我们假设溶液中毒素单体之间的相互作用至少部分由结构域I介导,并且我们已经在计算机上单独分析了结构域Iα-螺旋的同源寡聚化倾向。利用每个α-螺旋的许多同源序列,我们的策略允许选择进化上保守的相互作用。这些相互作用仅出现在α3和α5螺旋中,但只有α3在脂质双层中产生了合适取向的α-螺旋样本,在C14-甜菜碱中形成同四聚体,并允许使用位点特异性红外二色性(SSID)确定其在脂质双层中的旋转取向。在四聚体模型中确定的取向仅与进化上保守的模型之一一致。此外,实验发现抑制寡聚化的R99E突变在分子动力学模拟中极大地破坏了四聚体的稳定性。在这个模型中,螺旋3能够在不发生结构域I显著重排的情况下形成单体间相互作用,这与溶液中Cry毒素的现有晶体结构相符。这里提出的模型至少部分解释了报道的Cry毒素在溶液中的四聚体寡聚化以及合成α3肽对这种寡聚化的抑制作用。