Gurvich C T, Rossell S L
Monash Alfred Psychiatry research centre (MAPrc), Monash University Central Clinical School and The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Monash Alfred Psychiatry research centre (MAPrc), Monash University Central Clinical School and The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; Brain and Psychological Sciences Research Centre (BPsyC), Faculty of Life and Social Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia.
Behav Brain Res. 2014 Jul 1;267:12-6. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2014.03.015. Epub 2014 Mar 19.
Failures of inhibitory control can severely affect everyday life in healthy individuals and represent a common feature of many neuropsychiatric conditions, particularly disorders with dopaminergic disturbances implicated. This study's aim was to examine the interacting influences of three common and functional gene variants that influence dopaminergic pathways on an aspect of inhibitory control (action restraint). Three hundred and twenty two healthy adults were selected from an international consortium linked to Brain Research and Integrative Neuroscience (BRAINnet). DNA was extracted from cheek swab samples and participants were genotyped for the Val158Met single nucleotide polymorphism on COMT (rs 4680), C957T on DRD2 (rs 6277) and the 40bp variable number of tandem repeat on the DAT1 (SLC6A3, 10/10 vs 9+). Response inhibition was measured using a computerised Go/No-Go task. Main effects and interactions between genotypes were explored. We did not observe a genotype effect on fundamental measures of response inhibition, i.e. reaction time (RT) and commission errors. RT variability was significantly increased in DRD2 C957T heterozygotes. In conclusion, this large, non-clinical study reveals that the selected genetic polymorphisms regulating dopamine (COMT, DRD2 and DAT1) do not influence one aspect of response inhibition, action restraint, as measured by the Go/No-Go task, reinforcing the neuropharmacological dissociation between stop-signal and Go/No-Go tasks. Genetic variation in striatal dopamine may, however, contribute to intraindividual RT variability.
抑制控制功能障碍会严重影响健康个体的日常生活,是许多神经精神疾病的共同特征,尤其是那些涉及多巴胺能紊乱的疾病。本研究的目的是检验影响多巴胺能通路的三种常见功能性基因变异对抑制控制(行动抑制)某一方面的相互作用影响。从与脑研究和整合神经科学(BRAINnet)相关的国际联盟中选取了322名健康成年人。从口腔拭子样本中提取DNA,并对参与者进行儿茶酚-O-甲基转移酶(COMT)基因Val158Met单核苷酸多态性(rs 4680)、多巴胺D2受体(DRD2)基因C957T(rs 6277)以及多巴胺转运体1(DAT1,SLC6A3,10/10与9 +)基因40bp可变串联重复序列的基因分型。使用计算机化的Go/No-Go任务测量反应抑制。探索了基因型之间的主效应和相互作用。我们未观察到基因型对反应抑制基本指标(即反应时间(RT)和错误率)的影响。DRD2基因C957T杂合子的RT变异性显著增加。总之,这项大型非临床研究表明,所选的调节多巴胺的基因多态性(COMT、DRD2和DAT1)不会影响通过Go/No-Go任务测量的反应抑制的一个方面——行动抑制,这进一步证明了停止信号任务和Go/No-Go任务之间的神经药理学分离。然而,纹状体多巴胺的基因变异可能会导致个体内RT变异性。