Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Jul;472(7):2208-14. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3571-4.
Periprosthetic joint infection is a leading cause of failure after two-stage reimplantation. One cause of relapse may be persistent subclinical infection. Difficulty exists in detecting biofilm-forming infections. Sonication disrupts biofilm and has led to higher rates of positive intraoperative cultures.
QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: Our aims in this study were to determine (1) if sonication results were predictive of failure, including reinfection, at 2-year followup; and (2) whether sonication of antibiotic spacers at the time of reimplantation improves sensitivity of intraoperative cultures.
We prospectively followed 36 consecutive patients undergoing two-stage reimplantation for periprosthetic hip or knee infection. Minimum followup was 19 months (mean, 29.9 months; range, 19–38 months). Results of intraoperative cultures and sonicated antibiotic spacers were analyzed.
Positive sonication results were predictive of failure as defined by reinfection at 2-year followup. Among the 18 patients who had positive sonication results, reinfection developed in nine patients (50%) compared with two of 18 patients (11%) with negative sonication results (odds ratio, 8.0; 95% CI, 1.2–69.0). Sonication of antibiotic spacers improved the sensitivity of intraoperative cultures from 45% to 82%. [corrected].
Sonication of antibiotic spacers appears to be useful in predicting failure attributable to recurrent infection after two-stage reimplantation. For patients with positive sonication cultures during reimplantation, more aggressive antimicrobial treatment may be indicated after reimplantation.
Level III, diagnostic study. See the Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
二期翻修术后假体周围关节感染是导致翻修失败的主要原因。复发的原因之一可能是持续的亚临床感染。生物膜形成感染的检测存在困难。超声能破坏生物膜,并导致术中培养阳性率更高。
问题/目的:我们在本研究中的目的是确定(1)在 2 年随访时,超声检查结果是否可预测失败,包括再感染;(2)在二期翻修时对抗生素 spacer 进行超声检查是否能提高术中培养的敏感性。
我们前瞻性地随访了 36 例连续接受二期翻修术治疗的髋关节或膝关节假体周围感染患者。最低随访时间为 19 个月(平均 29.9 个月;范围,19~38 个月)。分析了术中培养和超声检查的抗生素 spacer 的结果。
阳性超声检查结果可预测 2 年随访时定义的失败,包括再感染。在 18 例阳性超声检查结果的患者中,9 例(50%)发生再感染,而 18 例阴性超声检查结果的患者中仅 2 例(11%)发生再感染(比值比,8.0;95% CI,1.2~69.0)。超声检查抗生素 spacer 提高了术中培养的敏感性,从 45%提高到 82%。
在二期翻修后,超声检查抗生素 spacer 似乎可用于预测由再感染引起的失败。对于在翻修时超声检查培养阳性的患者,翻修后可能需要更积极的抗菌治疗。
III 级,诊断研究。详见作者指南,以获取完整的证据等级描述。