Schiavon Leonardo de Lucca, Narciso-Schiavon Janaína Luz, de Carvalho-Filho Roberto José
Leonardo de Lucca Schiavon, Janaína Luz Narciso-Schiavon, Gastroenterology Division, Department of Internal Medicine, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, SC 88040-900, Brazil.
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Mar 21;20(11):2854-66. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i11.2854.
Assessment of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is considered a relevant part of patient care and key for decision making. Although liver biopsy has been considered the gold standard for staging liver fibrosis, it is an invasive technique and subject to sampling errors and significant intra- and inter-observer variability. Over the last decade, several noninvasive markers were proposed for liver fibrosis diagnosis in chronic HCV infection, with variable performance. Besides the clear advantage of being noninvasive, a more objective interpretation of test results may overcome the mentioned intra- and inter-observer variability of liver biopsy. In addition, these tests can theoretically offer a more accurate view of fibrogenic events occurring in the entire liver with the advantage of providing frequent fibrosis evaluation without additional risk. However, in general, these tests show low accuracy in discriminating between intermediate stages of fibrosis and may be influenced by several hepatic and extra-hepatic conditions. These methods are either serum markers (usually combined in a mathematical model) or imaging modalities that can be used separately or combined in algorithms to improve accuracy. In this review we will discuss the different noninvasive methods that are currently available for the evaluation of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C, their advantages, limitations and application in clinical practice.
慢性丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)感染中肝纤维化的评估被认为是患者护理的一个相关部分,也是决策的关键。尽管肝活检一直被视为肝纤维化分期的金标准,但它是一种侵入性技术,存在抽样误差以及显著的观察者内和观察者间差异。在过去十年中,人们提出了几种用于慢性HCV感染中肝纤维化诊断的非侵入性标志物,其性能各不相同。除了具有非侵入性这一明显优势外,对检测结果进行更客观的解读可能会克服上述肝活检中观察者内和观察者间的差异。此外,这些检测理论上可以更准确地反映整个肝脏中发生的纤维化事件,其优点是能够在不增加额外风险的情况下频繁进行纤维化评估。然而,一般来说,这些检测在区分纤维化中间阶段方面准确性较低,并且可能受到多种肝脏和肝外疾病的影响。这些方法要么是血清标志物(通常组合成一个数学模型),要么是成像方式,可以单独使用,也可以在算法中组合使用以提高准确性。在本综述中,我们将讨论目前可用于评估慢性丙型肝炎肝纤维化的不同非侵入性方法、它们的优点、局限性以及在临床实践中的应用。