Lany Jill, Gómez Rebecca L
University of Notre Dame.
The University of Arizona.
Lang Learn Dev. 2013 Jan 1;9(1):66-87. doi: 10.1080/15475441.2012.685826.
Probabilistically-cued co-occurrence relationships between word categories are common in natural languages but difficult to acquire. For example, in English, determiner-noun and auxiliary-verb dependencies both involve co-occurrence relationships, but determiner-noun relationships are more reliably marked by correlated distributional and phonological cues, and appear to be learned more readily. We tested whether experience with co-occurrence relationships that are more reliable promotes learning those that are less reliable using an artificial language paradigm. Prior experience with deterministically-cued contingencies did not promote learning of less reliably-cued structure, nor did prior experience with relationships instantiated in the same vocabulary. In contrast, prior experience with probabilistically-cued co-occurrence relationships instantiated in different vocabulary did enhance learning. Thus, experience with co-occurrence relationships sharing underlying structure but not vocabulary may be an important factor in learning grammatical patterns. Furthermore, experience with probabilistically-cued co-occurrence relationships, despite their difficultly for naïve learners, lays an important foundation for learning novel probabilistic structure.
词类之间基于概率提示的共现关系在自然语言中很常见,但难以习得。例如,在英语中,限定词 - 名词和助动词 - 动词的依存关系都涉及共现关系,但限定词 - 名词关系通过相关的分布和语音线索能更可靠地标记出来,并且似乎更容易被习得。我们使用人工语言范式测试了更可靠的共现关系的经验是否能促进对不太可靠的共现关系的学习。确定性提示的意外情况的先前经验并不能促进对不太可靠提示结构的学习,在相同词汇中实例化的关系的先前经验也不能。相比之下,在不同词汇中实例化的概率性提示共现关系的先前经验确实增强了学习效果。因此,具有共享底层结构但不共享词汇的共现关系的经验可能是学习语法模式的一个重要因素。此外,概率性提示共现关系的经验,尽管对初学者来说有难度,但为学习新的概率结构奠定了重要基础。