Humanities Division, Emory University, Oxford College, Oxford, Georgia, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 23;19(7):e0302355. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302355. eCollection 2024.
The importance of cues in language learning has long been established and it is clear that cues are an essential part of both first language (L1) and second/additional language (L2/A) acquisition. The effects of cue reliability and frequency, along with the competition between cues have been shown to significantly impact learners' pace of acquisition of these language-specific patterns. However, natural languages do not allow for a clear picture of how the forms of cues themselves affect their perception, uptake, and generalizability. In this study, we developed an artificial vocabulary consisting of determiners and nouns. Within these nouns, completely reliable cues were developed and equally distributed as long and short cues over three possible positions: beginning, middle, or end. Through a word-pair learning study, we show that length and position of cues variably affects agreement accuracy, and that noticing of cues during training is less important for known words, and more important for novel ones when deciding on inter-word gender-like agreement.
语言学习中线索的重要性早已确立,很明显,线索是母语(L1)和第二/附加语言(L2/A)习得的重要组成部分。线索的可靠性和频率的影响,以及线索之间的竞争,已经被证明会显著影响学习者对这些特定于语言的模式的习得速度。然而,自然语言并不能清楚地说明线索本身的形式如何影响它们的感知、接受和泛化。在这项研究中,我们开发了一个由限定词和名词组成的人工词汇。在这些名词中,完全可靠的线索被开发出来,并以长和短两种线索的形式平均分布在三个可能的位置:开头、中间或结尾。通过一个词对学习研究,我们表明线索的长度和位置会对一致性准确性产生不同的影响,并且在训练期间对线索的注意对于已知单词来说并不那么重要,而对于决定词间性别一致性的新单词来说则更为重要。