Robertson Jason O, Grau-Sepulveda Maria V, Okada Shoichi, O'Brien Sean M, Matthew Brennan J, Shah Ashish S, Itoh Akinobu, Damiano Ralph J, Prasad Sunil, Silvestry Scott C
Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri.
Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2014 Jun;33(6):609-17. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2014.01.861. Epub 2014 Jan 24.
Performing concomitant tricuspid valve procedures (TVPs) in left ventricular assist device (LVAD) patients with significant pre-operative tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is controversial, and no studies have been large enough to definitively guide therapy.
Between January 2006 and September 2012, 2,196 patients with moderate to severe pre-operative TR from 115 institutions underwent implantation of a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (LVAD) as reported by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database. Of these, 588 (27%) underwent a concomitant TVP. Inverse probability weighting based on propensity score was used to adjust for differences between the LVAD alone and LVAD+TVP groups, and outcomes were compared.
Most patients in the LVAD+TVP group underwent an annuloplasty alone (81.1%). Concomitant TVP did not affect risk of post-operative right VAD insertion (risk ratio [RR], 0.81; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.49-1.36; p = 0.4310) or death (RR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.68-1.33; p = 0.7658). However, TVP was associated with an increased risk for post-operative renal failure (RR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.13-2.08; p = 0.0061), dialysis (RR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.03-2.15; p = 0.0339), reoperation (RR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.07-1.45; p = 0.0056), greater total transfusion requirement (RR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.01-1.05; p = 0.0013), and hospital length of stay > 21 days (RR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.16-1.43; p < 0.0001). Time on the ventilator and intensive care unit length of stay were also significantly prolonged for the LVAD+TVP group.
Performing a concomitant TVP for continuous-flow LVAD patients with moderate to severe TR did not reduce early death or right VAD requirement and was associated with worse early post-operative outcomes. These data caution against routine concomitant TVP based solely on degree of pre-operative TR and suggest that additional selection criteria are needed to identify those patients in whom concomitant TVP may prevent post-operative right ventricular failure.
对于术前存在严重三尖瓣反流(TR)的左心室辅助装置(LVAD)患者,同期进行三尖瓣手术(TVP)存在争议,且尚无足够大规模的研究能够明确指导治疗。
根据胸外科医师协会国家数据库报告,2006年1月至2012年9月期间,来自115家机构的2196例术前存在中重度TR的患者接受了连续流左心室辅助装置(LVAD)植入术。其中,588例(27%)患者同期进行了TVP。采用基于倾向评分的逆概率加权法来调整单纯LVAD组和LVAD+TVP组之间的差异,并比较两组的结局。
LVAD+TVP组中的大多数患者仅接受了瓣环成形术(81.1%)。同期进行TVP并不影响术后右心室辅助装置植入的风险(风险比[RR],0.81;95%置信区间[CI],0.49-1.36;p = 0.4310)或死亡风险(RR,0.95;95%CI,0.68-1.33;p = 0.7658)。然而,TVP与术后肾衰竭风险增加相关(RR,1.53;95%CI,1.13-2.08;p = 0.0061)、透析风险增加(RR,1.49;95%CI,1.03-2.15;p = 0.0339)、再次手术风险增加(RR,1.24;95%CI,1.07-1.45;p = 0.0056)、总输血需求量增加(RR,1.03;95%CI,1.01-1.05;p = 0.0013)以及住院时间>21天的风险增加(RR,1.29;95%CI,1.16-1.43;p < 0.0001)。LVAD+TVP组的机械通气时间和重症监护病房住院时间也显著延长。
对于中重度TR的连续流LVAD患者同期进行TVP并不能降低早期死亡风险或右心室辅助装置的需求,且与术后早期结局较差相关。这些数据警示不要仅基于术前TR的程度常规同期进行TVP,并表明需要额外的选择标准来识别那些同期进行TVP可能预防术后右心室衰竭的患者。