Låftman Sara Brolin, Bergström Malin, Modin Bitte, Östberg Viveca
Centre for Health Equity Studies (CHESS), Stockholm University/Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
Centre for Health Equity Studies (CHESS), Stockholm University/Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Scand J Public Health. 2014 Jul;42(5):456-62. doi: 10.1177/1403494814526798. Epub 2014 Mar 24.
Among children with separated parents, the arrangement of joint physical custody, i.e. children living equally much in both parents' homes, has increased substantially during the last decades in Sweden. To date, empirical research on the living conditions of this group is limited. This study analyses family type differences in turning to parents for emotional support and in subjective health among adolescents. The focus of the study is adolescents in joint physical custody, who are compared with those living with two original parents in the same household; those living (only) in a single-parent household; and those living (only) in a reconstituted family.
The data come from the Stockholm School Survey of 2004, a total population survey of students in grade 9 (15-16 years) in Stockholm (n=8,840). Ordinary least squares (OLS) regressions were conducted.
Turning to both parents about problems is most commonly reported by adolescents in intact families, followed by those in joint physical custody. Adolescents in non-traditional family types report worse subjective health than adolescents in intact families, but the difference is smaller for those in joint physical custody than for those living with a single parent. The slightly poorer health of adolescents in joint physical custody than those in intact families is not explained by their lower use of parents as a source of emotional support.
The study suggests that joint physical custody is associated with a higher inclination to use parents as a source of emotional support and better subjective health than other post-divorce family types.
在父母分居的孩子中,共同实际监护的安排,即孩子在父母双方家中生活的时间均等,在过去几十年里在瑞典大幅增加。迄今为止,关于这一群体生活状况的实证研究有限。本研究分析了青少年在向父母寻求情感支持和主观健康方面的家庭类型差异。研究重点是共同实际监护的青少年,并将其与同住在一个家庭中的亲生父母双方生活的青少年、(仅)生活在单亲家庭中的青少年以及(仅)生活在重组家庭中的青少年进行比较。
数据来自2004年斯德哥尔摩学校调查,这是一项对斯德哥尔摩9年级(15 - 16岁)学生的总人口调查(n = 8840)。进行了普通最小二乘法(OLS)回归分析。
完整家庭中的青少年最常报告会向父母双方倾诉问题,其次是共同实际监护家庭中的青少年。非传统家庭类型的青少年报告的主观健康状况比完整家庭中的青少年差,但共同实际监护家庭中的青少年与单亲家庭青少年相比,差异较小。共同实际监护家庭中的青少年健康状况略逊于完整家庭中的青少年,这并非由他们较少将父母作为情感支持来源所致。
该研究表明,与其他离婚后的家庭类型相比,共同实际监护与更高的将父母作为情感支持来源的倾向以及更好的主观健康状况相关。