Volkmann H, Kühnert H, Dannberg G, Heinke M
Department of Internal Medicine, Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, G.D.R.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1989 Jan;12(1 Pt 2):258-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1989.tb02655.x.
Recurrent episodes of ventricular tachycardia not responding to medical treatment occurred in a 56-year-old man. Electrophysiological investigation showed ventricular tachycardia due to bundle branch reentry. Using a method similar to catheter ablation of the atrioventricular junction, ablation of the right bundle branch was performed by an electrical shock of 250 joules. While before the ablation ventricular tachycardia occurred several times a day and its induction by programmed ventricular stimulation was facilitated by the administration of antiarrhythmic drugs, no initiation of ventricular tachycardia was possible after ablation of the right bundle branch. Over a follow-up of 30 months the patient has not suffered from tachycardia and the right bundle branch block persists.
一名56岁男性反复出现室性心动过速,药物治疗无效。电生理检查显示为束支折返性室性心动过速。采用类似于房室结导管消融的方法,通过250焦耳的电击对右束支进行消融。消融前,室性心动过速每天发作数次,给予抗心律失常药物可促进程序心室刺激诱发室性心动过速,但右束支消融后无法诱发室性心动过速。在30个月的随访中,患者未出现心动过速,右束支传导阻滞持续存在。